Aberg J, Abrahamsson B, Grind M, Nyberg G, Olofsson B
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1997;52(6):471-7. doi: 10.1007/s002280050321.
The primary aim of this study was to investigate whether bioequivalence is achieved for a new fixed combination of extended-release (ER) felodipine and controlled-release (CR/ZOK) metoprolol compared with the free combination of felodipine ER metoprolol CR/ZOK. The second aim was to study whether there was an interaction in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics between felodipine and metoprolol when administered as ER formulation.
Two four-way cross-over studies were performed in 36 young subjects and 24 elderly subjects with frequent measurement of drug plasma concentrations, blood pressures and heart rate. The pharmacokinetic analysis included enantioselective analysis in six subjects.
Bioequivalence between the fixed combination and the free combination was observed for the two drugs (mean difference 27%) except for a minor deviation regarding Cmax of metoprolol in the elderly. No significant interaction was shown except for a small increase (6%) of metoprolol AUC in the younger subjects. Mean plasma S-/R-enantiomer ratios were almost identical for the different treatments. Blood pressure and heart rate was significantly reduced for the fixed combination compared with felodipine ER in the younger and the elderly subjects. No significant difference regarding pharmacodynamics was detected between the fixed combination and the corresponding free combination.
The fixed combination consistently provides fairly constant and effective felodipine and metoprolol concentrations after once-daily administration of one tablet. It is clinically interchangeable with the free combination of metoprolol CR/ZOK tablets and felodipine ER tablets. Finally, felodipine and metoprolol do not interact on a pharmacokinetic level when administered as the fixed combination.
本研究的主要目的是调查与非洛地平缓释片(ER)和酒石酸美托洛尔控释片(CR/ZOK)的自由组合相比,新的非洛地平缓释片和酒石酸美托洛尔控释片的固定组合是否具有生物等效性。第二个目的是研究非洛地平缓释片和酒石酸美托洛尔控释片联合给药时在药代动力学和药效学方面是否存在相互作用。
对36名年轻受试者和24名老年受试者进行了两项四交叉研究,频繁测量药物血浆浓度、血压和心率。药代动力学分析包括对6名受试者的对映体选择性分析。
除老年受试者中美托洛尔Cmax略有偏差外,两种药物的固定组合和自由组合之间观察到生物等效性(平均差异27%)。除年轻受试者中美托洛尔AUC略有增加(6%)外,未显示出显著的相互作用。不同治疗的平均血浆S-/R-对映体比率几乎相同。与年轻和老年受试者中的非洛地平缓释片相比,固定组合显著降低了血压和心率。固定组合与相应的自由组合在药效学方面未检测到显著差异。
固定组合在每日服用一片后始终能提供相当恒定且有效的非洛地平和美托洛尔浓度。它在临床上可与酒石酸美托洛尔控释片和非洛地平缓释片的自由组合互换。最后,非洛地平和美托洛尔以固定组合给药时在药代动力学水平上不相互作用。