• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护士对无针血管通路系统可接受性的评估。

Evaluation of the acceptability of a needleless vascular-access system by nurses.

作者信息

Ihrig M, Cookson S T, Campbell K, Hartstein A I, Jarvis W R

机构信息

Hospital Infections Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 1997 Oct;25(5):434-8. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(97)90095-x.

DOI:10.1016/s0196-6553(97)90095-x
PMID:9343631
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Needleless intravenous-access devices have been introduced in an effort to reduce needlestick injuries and possible transmission of blood-borne pathogens to health care workers. However, there are no data on the acceptance of these devices by nursing personnel.

METHODS

A survey of nursing personnel was taken at Indiana University Medical Center after introduction of a needleless intravenous device to determine their opinion after use of the needleless device.

RESULTS

The majority of the nurses (72 of 94, 70%) had a favorable overall opinion of the device. Among those with a favorable opinion, 76% (55/72) responded that reduced risk of needlestick injury was the most important reason. Among those who had a negative opinion about the needleless-device system, 32% (7/22) reported that contamination risk was their major concern. Those who were trained before device use were more likely to properly use and maintain the needleless intravenous-access system. Of 89 respondents, 75.3% (67/89) believed that the initial training was adequate; however, 43% (29/67) thought that additional training after using the device for some time would have been beneficial.

CONCLUSIONS

Comprehensive education programs that include training before and after device use are necessary if new needleless intravenous-access systems are to be successfully introduced and accepted by nursing personnel.

摘要

背景

无针静脉输液装置已被引入,旨在减少针刺伤以及血源性病原体向医护人员的潜在传播。然而,目前尚无关于护理人员对这些装置接受程度的数据。

方法

在印第安纳大学医学中心引入无针静脉输液装置后,对护理人员进行了一项调查,以确定他们在使用该无针装置后的看法。

结果

大多数护士(94名中的72名,占70%)对该装置总体评价良好。在持肯定意见的人中,76%(55/72)表示针刺伤风险降低是最重要的原因。在对无针装置系统持否定意见的人中,32%(7/22)报告说污染风险是他们主要关注的问题。在装置使用前接受过培训的人更有可能正确使用和维护无针静脉输液系统。在89名受访者中,75.3%(67/89)认为初始培训是足够的;然而,43%(29/67)认为在使用该装置一段时间后进行额外培训可能会有帮助。

结论

如果要成功引入并被护理人员接受新的无针静脉输液系统,就需要开展包括装置使用前后培训的综合教育项目。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the acceptability of a needleless vascular-access system by nurses.护士对无针血管通路系统可接受性的评估。
Am J Infect Control. 1997 Oct;25(5):434-8. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(97)90095-x.
2
The usability and acceptability of a needleless connector system.
Br J Nurs. 2007;16(5):267-71. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2007.16.5.22991.
3
Microbiologic evaluation of needleless and needle-access devices.无针和带针接入装置的微生物学评估
Am J Infect Control. 1997 Oct;25(5):377-80. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(97)90081-x.
4
Needleless IV access means fewer costs.无针静脉通路意味着成本更低。
Mater Manag Health Care. 2007 Jul;16(7):46-8.
5
Randomized prospective study of the impact of three needleless intravenous systems on needlestick injury rates.三种无针静脉输液系统对针刺伤发生率影响的随机前瞻性研究。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1996 Dec;17(12):803-8. doi: 10.1086/647240.
6
Study of a needleless intermittent intravenous-access system for peripheral infusions: analysis of staff, patient, and institutional outcomes.外周输注无针间歇性静脉通路系统的研究:医护人员、患者及机构结局分析
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1998 Jun;19(6):401-6. doi: 10.1086/647839.
7
Evaluation and implementation of a needleless intravenous system: making needlesticks a needless problem.无针静脉输液系统的评估与实施:让针刺伤成为历史难题。
Am J Infect Control. 1993 Feb;21(1):39-41. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(93)90206-j.
8
Evaluating needleless i.v. tubing.评估无针静脉输液管。
Am J Nurs. 1993 Feb;93(2):74-5. doi: 10.1097/00000446-199302000-00024.
9
A needleless closed system device (CLAVE) protects from intravascular catheter tip and hub colonization: a prospective randomized study.一种无针密闭系统装置(CLAVE)可防止血管内导管尖端和接头处定植:一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Hosp Infect. 2003 Aug;54(4):279-87. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(03)00136-1.
10
Complying with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Bloodborne Pathogens Standard: implementing needleless systems and intravenous safety devices.遵守职业安全与健康管理局的《血源性病原体标准》:实施无针系统和静脉安全装置。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004 Mar;20(3):209-214. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000117932.65522.93.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of safety-engineered devices by healthcare workers for intravenous and/or phlebotomy procedures in healthcare settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.医护人员在医疗机构中使用安全工程设备进行静脉注射和/或静脉穿刺操作:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 1;16:458. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1705-y.