Monczak Y, Trudel M, Lamph W W, Miller W H
Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, the Department of Pathology, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital and McGill University Department of Experimental Medicine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Blood. 1997 Nov 1;90(9):3345-55.
Retinoic acid (RA) induces differentiation, followed by apoptosis in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) cells, both in vitro and in patients. One problem in understanding these mechanisms is to distinguish molecular events leading to differentiation from those leading to apoptosis. We have identified a leukemic cell line, PLB-985, where RA directly induces apoptosis with no morphologic, genetic, or cell-surface marker evidence of differentiation. These cells differentiate following dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), but not RA, treatment. Two-color flow cytometry showed no alteration of the cell cycle after RA treatment, and cell-surface marker analysis of CD11a, CD11b, and CD13 showed no modulation typical of differentiating cells. RNA expression of myeloblastin and transglutaminase, genes regulated by RA-induced differentiation in NB4 cells, was unchanged by RA treatment. Instead, RA induced apoptosis, as shown by typical apoptotic morphological features, genomic DNA laddering, and positive labeling in the TUNEL assay. We found that induction of apoptosis in this model requires a different pattern of retinoid receptor binding and transcriptional activation than is seen in APL cells. As previously described, treatment with retinoid receptor-selective ligands showed that stimulation of RAR alone is sufficient to induce differentiation and apoptosis in NB4 cells, and that stimulation of RXR has no effect on the parameters analyzed. In PLB-985 cells, on the other hand, apoptosis was induced only upon costimulation of both RAR and RXR. Stimulation of either receptor alone had no effect on the cells. Consistent with these findings, bcl-2 RNA and protein levels were downregulated after stimulation of both RAR and RXR, but not with an RAR-specific ligand alone, as in NB4 cells. The expression of several other bcl-2 family members (bcl-X, ich-1, bax, bag, and bak ) and retinoid receptors (RARalpha, RXRalpha, and RXRbeta) was not affected by treatment with RAR- and/or RXR-activating retinoids; RARbeta RNA was undetectable before and after retinoid treatment. Thus, our cell model provides a useful tool in determining the genetic events mediating apoptosis as a response to RA, unobscured by events implicated in differentiation.
维甲酸(RA)在体外及患者体内均可诱导急性早幼粒细胞白血病(APL)细胞分化,随后引发凋亡。理解这些机制存在的一个问题是区分导致分化的分子事件与导致凋亡的分子事件。我们鉴定出一种白血病细胞系PLB - 985,在该细胞系中,RA直接诱导凋亡,且无分化的形态学、遗传学或细胞表面标志物证据。这些细胞在二甲基亚砜(DMSO)处理后会分化,但RA处理后不会分化。双色流式细胞术显示RA处理后细胞周期未改变,对CD11a、CD11b和CD13的细胞表面标志物分析显示无分化细胞典型的调节变化。髓母细胞素和转谷氨酰胺酶的RNA表达在NB4细胞中受RA诱导分化调控,而RA处理后其表达未改变。相反,RA诱导了凋亡,表现为典型的凋亡形态特征、基因组DNA梯状条带以及TUNEL检测中的阳性标记。我们发现,在该模型中诱导凋亡所需的类视黄醇受体结合和转录激活模式与APL细胞中所见不同。如前所述,用类视黄醇受体选择性配体处理表明,单独刺激RAR足以诱导NB4细胞分化和凋亡,而刺激RXR对所分析的参数无影响。另一方面,在PLB - 985细胞中,仅在同时刺激RAR和RXR时才诱导凋亡。单独刺激任一受体对细胞均无影响。与这些发现一致,与NB4细胞一样,同时刺激RAR和RXR后bcl - 2 RNA和蛋白水平下调,但单独用RAR特异性配体刺激则无此现象。用激活RAR和/或RXR的类视黄醇处理对其他几种bcl - 2家族成员(bcl - X、ich - 1、bax、bag和bak)以及类视黄醇受体(RARα、RXRα和RXRβ) 的表达无影响;类视黄醇处理前后均未检测到RARβ RNA。因此,我们的细胞模型为确定介导凋亡作为对RA反应的遗传事件提供了一个有用的工具,不受分化相关事件的干扰。