Roithmann R, Shpirer I, Cole P, Chapnik J, Szalai J P, Zamel N
Department of Otolaryngology, Universidade Luterna do Brasil, Canoas, Brazil.
Ear Nose Throat J. 1997 Oct;76(10):747-50, 752.
Geometric changes of the nasal airway in response to allergen challenge were measured by acoustic rhinometry (AR) and the sensitivity of the method was compared with that of rhinomanometry. Ten asymptomatic patients who suffered from ragweed allergic rhinitis were challenged out of season. The use of a custom-made noninvasive nasal adapter was an important feature of the measurement technique. A dose-dependent decrease in nasal cross-sectional area was found at and posterior to the entrance to the nasal valve. Both rhinometric and rhinomanometric methods were equivalent in sensing the changes in nasal patency due to allergen exposure (p = 0.73). Acoustic rhinometry, however, was simpler, more quickly performed and more comfortable for the subjects than was rhinomanometry by body plethysmography. AR is an alternative objective method for measurement of nasal mucosal responses, as in allergen challenge.
通过声反射鼻测量法(AR)测量鼻气道对过敏原激发的几何变化,并将该方法的敏感性与鼻测压法进行比较。对10名患有豚草过敏性鼻炎的无症状患者在非发病季节进行激发试验。使用定制的无创鼻适配器是测量技术的一个重要特点。在鼻瓣膜入口处及其后方发现鼻横截面积呈剂量依赖性减小。鼻测量法和鼻测压法在感知因过敏原暴露引起的鼻通畅度变化方面相当(p = 0.73)。然而,与体容积描记法的鼻测压法相比,声反射鼻测量法更简单、操作更快且受试者更舒适。声反射鼻测量法是一种用于测量鼻黏膜反应的客观替代方法,如在过敏原激发试验中。