Mannaerts H, Balk A, Roelandt J
Thoraxcentre, University Hospital Rotterdam Dijkzigt, The Netherlands.
Eur Heart J. 1997 Oct;18(10):1663-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a015149.
The study set out to assess the relative contributions of donor heart rate, respiration and recipient atrial contraction on the mean of pulsed wave transmitral Doppler flow indices in orthotopic heart transplant recipients. This would provide information on the theoretical usefulness of pacemaker synchronization of recipient atrial contraction, as well as on the validity of certain strategies used for pulsed wave Dopper analysis of diastolic left ventricular function, which have excluded beats based on recipient atrial contraction timing.
Thirty two consecutive patients undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation in our centre were prospectively studied. The following Doppler indices were analysed: peak early diastolic velocity (E) and its area under the Doppler curve (TVIE), diastolic velocity after donor atrial contraction (A) and its area under the curve (TVIA), the total area under the curve (TVI), the isovolumic relaxation period (IVR), the diastolic filling period, the normalized peak filling rate and the pressure half time.
Only 81 out of 347 recordings (23%) allowed analysis of the recipient P wave and thus recipient atrial contraction timing, heart rate and the respiration phase in 22 patients for a total of 1579 beats. The isovolumic relaxation period, E, pressure half time and TVIA are not influenced by donor heart rate. For the isovolumic relaxation period, E, TVI and TVIE, respiration contributes as much as recipient atrial contraction timing to beat-to-beat variation. Pressure half time, the diastolic filling period and peak filling rate were not affected by respiration. TVI was not affected by recipient atrial contraction timing.
With respect to analysis of diastolic function, exclusion of beats based on recipient atrial contraction timing is invalid for the isovolumic relaxation period. E, TVI and TVIE, since these are equally influenced by respiration. Since TVI was not affected by recipient atrial contraction timing, pacemaker synchronization of donor and recipient atria is not expected to be useful in patients with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.
本研究旨在评估供体心率、呼吸以及受体心房收缩对原位心脏移植受者脉冲波经二尖瓣多普勒血流指数均值的相对贡献。这将为起搏器同步受体心房收缩的理论实用性提供信息,同时也为用于舒张期左心室功能脉冲波多普勒分析的某些策略的有效性提供信息,这些策略基于受体心房收缩时间排除了一些搏动。
对本中心连续32例行原位心脏移植的患者进行前瞻性研究。分析了以下多普勒指数:舒张早期峰值速度(E)及其多普勒曲线下面积(TVIE)、供体心房收缩后的舒张期速度(A)及其曲线下面积(TVIA)、曲线下总面积(TVI)、等容舒张期(IVR)、舒张充盈期、标准化峰值充盈率和压力减半时间。
在347次记录中,只有81次(23%)能够分析受体P波,从而确定22例患者的受体心房收缩时间、心率和呼吸阶段,共计1579次搏动。等容舒张期、E、压力减半时间和TVIA不受供体心率影响。对于等容舒张期、E、TVI和TVIE,呼吸对逐搏变化的影响与受体心房收缩时间相同。压力减半时间、舒张充盈期和峰值充盈率不受呼吸影响。TVI不受受体心房收缩时间影响。
就舒张功能分析而言,基于受体心房收缩时间排除搏动对等容舒张期、E、TVI和TVIE无效,因为这些指标同样受呼吸影响。由于TVI不受受体心房收缩时间影响,对于左心室舒张功能障碍患者,供体和受体心房的起搏器同步预计无用。