Suppr超能文献

公共卫生政策应如何制定?欧洲公共卫生的一个案例研究。

How should public health policy be developed? A case study in European public health.

作者信息

Birt C A, Gunning-Schepers L, Hayes A, Joyce L

机构信息

Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham.

出版信息

J Public Health Med. 1997 Sep;19(3):262-7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024628.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Article 129 of the Treaty of Rome (as amended at Maastricht) gave new powers to the European Union (EU) institutions to develop and implement public health programmes at EU level. The authors were invited by the cabinet of Commissioner Flynn to assist the Commission by developing new policy proposals in certain specific areas.

METHODS

The approach was agreed with officials of the Public Health Unit (now the Public Health and Safety Directorate) in DG V. Working groups of experts were appointed to review policy options in five discrete areas. The experts were resident in 13 of the 15 current EU member states, and were employed in academic departments, in health ministries, in local government, and in non-governmental organizations. Draft reports were presented to an evaluation panel of additional experts, whose comments contributed to the final report to the Commission.

RESULTS

The final report consisted of five main chapters, corresponding to the work of the five working groups. The recommendations were grouped into those for which implementation would be short term, medium term or longer term, and these were summarized as a Plan of Action.

CONCLUSION

Five criteria for good public health policy development were satisfied, but the approach used was excessively expensive and time-consuming. Some further lessons for future policy development work have also been recorded. This work provided a fascinating insight into the workings of the EU institutions.

摘要

背景

《罗马条约》(经马斯特里赫特修订)第129条赋予欧盟机构新的权力,使其能够在欧盟层面制定和实施公共卫生计划。作者受弗林专员办公室邀请,通过在某些特定领域制定新的政策提案来协助委员会。

方法

该方法与第五总司公共卫生处(现为公共卫生与安全司)的官员达成一致。指定了专家工作组来审查五个不同领域的政策选项。这些专家来自15个现任欧盟成员国中的13个国家,受雇于学术部门、卫生部、地方政府和非政府组织。起草的报告提交给了一个由其他专家组成的评估小组,他们的意见促成了提交给委员会的最终报告。

结果

最终报告由五章主要内容组成,与五个工作组的工作相对应。建议被分为短期、中期或长期实施的建议,并汇总为一项行动计划。

结论

满足了良好公共卫生政策制定的五项标准,但所采用的方法成本过高且耗时过长。还记录了一些未来政策制定工作的进一步经验教训。这项工作为了解欧盟机构的运作提供了饶有趣味的视角。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验