Junaid A, Dubinsky I L
McMaster University Hospital, McMaster University Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
J Emerg Med. 1997 Sep-Oct;15(5):593-9. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(97)00118-2.
A pilot study was conducted to enumerate the most common evaluations done in the emergency department (ED) of a community hospital in assessing patients presenting with a first episode of syncope and to determine the feasibility of defining a clinically useful set of investigations to identify the subset of syncopal patients that can be safely discharged from the ED. The study was conducted as a retrospective chart review of patients seen during an 8 week period. In the course of the study, 33 consecutive adult patients presenting to the ED with first episodes of syncope were identified. Patients were excluded if they had previous recurrent syncopal episodes or a known disorder leading to syncope. ED charts of the participants were reviewed to determine the types of investigations for syncope done by unblinded emergency physicians, which investigations showed abnormal results, and which were useful in determining etiology of syncope or in deciding which patients needed admission. The average number of investigations performed on each patient was 7 +/- 4, with a range of 1-17 investigations. Twelve percent of syncopal patients (4/33) were deemed, retrospectively, to have required hospital admission based on a review of their charts and follow-up interviews. Without specific clinical indicators, laboratory and radiologic investigations were not useful in determining either the etiology of the syncopal episode or the need for admission. In this small study, few patients presenting with new onset syncope required admission. The number and types of investigations performed on these patients was inconsistent. Further study is needed to determine whether syncopal patients requiring admission can be identified in the ED with a small number of standard inexpensive laboratory investigations.
开展了一项试点研究,以列举在一家社区医院急诊科对首次发作晕厥患者进行评估时最常用的检查项目,并确定定义一套临床有用的检查方法以识别可从急诊科安全出院的晕厥患者子集的可行性。该研究通过对8周内就诊患者的病历进行回顾性分析展开。在研究过程中,确定了33例连续到急诊科就诊的首次发作晕厥的成年患者。如果患者既往有复发性晕厥发作或已知导致晕厥的疾病,则将其排除。对参与者的急诊病历进行审查,以确定非盲法急诊医生针对晕厥所做的检查类型、哪些检查结果异常,以及哪些检查有助于确定晕厥病因或决定哪些患者需要住院。每位患者平均接受的检查次数为7±4次,检查次数范围为1 - 17次。根据病历审查和随访访谈,回顾性地认定12%的晕厥患者(4/33)需要住院。在没有特定临床指标的情况下,实验室检查和影像学检查对于确定晕厥发作的病因或住院需求均无帮助。在这项小型研究中,很少有新发晕厥患者需要住院。对这些患者进行的检查数量和类型并不一致。需要进一步研究以确定是否可通过少量标准且廉价的实验室检查在急诊科识别出需要住院的晕厥患者。