Suppr超能文献

毒蕈碱M4受体介导兔肛门尾骨肌非肾上腺素能非胆碱能舒张作用的证据。

Evidence for muscarinic M4 receptors mediating nonadrenergic noncholinergic relaxations in rabbit anococcygeus muscle.

作者信息

Gross J, Mutschler E, Lambrecht G

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Biocentre Niederursel, University of Frankfurt, Germany.

出版信息

Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1997 Oct;356(4):505-16. doi: 10.1007/pl00005084.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to characterize the muscarinic receptor subtype mediating nonadrenergic noncholinergic (NANC) relaxations in the rabbit anococcygeus muscle (RAM) by the use of muscarinic receptor agonists and a battery of key muscarinic antagonists. In addition, experiments were carried out to identify the NANC neurotransmitter(s) involved in the inhibitory NANC neurotransmission. In preparations with histamine-raised tone, the nonselective muscarinic agonists (pD2 values) (+)-muscarine (5.23), cis-dioxolane (5.16), oxotremorine M (4.95) and carbachol (4.06) produced concentration-dependent relaxations corresponding to 72.6-85.0% of the histamine-induced precontraction. In contrast, the subtype-preferring (M1/M4 over M2 and M3 receptors) agonists 4-(3-chlorophenylcarbamoyloxy)-2-butynyltrimethylammonium chloride (McN-A-343), (S)-4-(dimethylamino)-1-methyl-2-butynyl-N-(3-chlorophenyl)carbamate methobromide [(S)-BN 228], (R)- and (S)-N-methyl-N-(1-methyl-4-pyrrolidino-2-butynyl)acetamide [(R)- and (S)-BM 5] showed no or rather low [(S)-BN 228] muscarinic activity. The low potencies, together with the ineffectiveness of some agonists, indicated a low effective receptor reserve associated with the relaxant response. No contractile responses to (+)-muscarine were observed neither in unstimulated nor in precontracted preparations suggesting that the existence of an excitatory postjunctional muscarinic receptor may be excluded. The nicotinic antagonist hexamethonium had no influence on relaxant responses to (+)-muscarine, but abolished relaxations elicited by (-)-nicotine. This demonstrates that the RAM contains also nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (AchRs) mediating inhibitory NANC responses. Relaxations induced by the stimulation of muscarinic and nicotinic AchRs as well as by electrical field stimulation (EFS) were completely abolished by tetrodotoxin and were also sensitive to the nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor N(G)-nitro-L-arginine (L-NOARG), indicating that NO plays an important role as an inhibitory NANC transmitter in RAM. All muscarinic antagonists investigated did not influence the histamine-induced precontraction, but shifted the concentration-response curve of (+)-muscarine to the right in a parallel fashion. Schild analysis yielded regression lines of unit slope, indicating competitive antagonism. The following rank order of antagonist potencies (pA2 values) was found: 11-([4-[4-(diethylamino)-butyl]-1-piperidinyl]-acetyl-5,11-dihydro-6H-py rido (2,3-b) (1,4)-benzodiazepine-6-one hydrochloride (AQ-RA 741; 8.08) = himbacine (8.03) > or = tripitramine (7.69) > or = p-fluorohexahydro-sila-difenidol (p-F-HHSiD; 7.48) > or = methoctramine (7.30) > or = pirenzepine (7.18) > or = guanylpirenzepine (6.24). A comparison of the pA2 values determined in the RAM with published data from binding studies at muscarinic M1-M4 and m5 receptors suggests that the functional muscarinic receptor mediating NANC relaxation in the RAM is of the M4 subtype. Taken together, the results obtained in the present study provide convincing evidence that relaxant responses elicited by muscarinic stimuli in RAM are nitrergic in nature and mediated by muscarinic M4 receptors located somadendritically on NANC neurons. Thus, the isolated RAM may serve as a functional muscarinic M4 receptor model.

摘要

本研究的目的是通过使用毒蕈碱受体激动剂和一系列关键的毒蕈碱拮抗剂,来表征介导兔肛门尾骨肌(RAM)非肾上腺素能非胆碱能(NANC)舒张的毒蕈碱受体亚型。此外,还进行了实验以鉴定参与抑制性NANC神经传递的NANC神经递质。在组胺引起张力升高的标本中,非选择性毒蕈碱激动剂(pD2值)(+)-毒蕈碱(5.23)、顺式二氧戊环(5.16)、氧化震颤素M(4.95)和卡巴胆碱(4.06)产生浓度依赖性舒张,相当于组胺诱导的预收缩的72.6 - 85.0%。相比之下,亚型选择性激动剂(M1/M4优先于M2和M3受体)4-(3-氯苯基氨甲酰氧基)-2-丁炔基三甲基氯化铵(McN-A-343)、(S)-4-(二甲基氨基)-1-甲基-2-丁炔基-N-(3-氯苯基)氨基甲酸甲酯甲溴化物[(S)-BN 228]、(R)-和(S)-N-甲基-N-(1-甲基-4-吡咯烷基-2-丁炔基)乙酰胺[(R)-和(S)-BM 5]显示无或相当低的[(S)-BN 228]毒蕈碱活性。低效能以及一些激动剂的无效性表明与舒张反应相关的有效受体储备较低。在未刺激和预收缩的标本中均未观察到对(+)-毒蕈碱的收缩反应,这表明可以排除兴奋性节后毒蕈碱受体的存在。烟碱拮抗剂六甲铵对(+)-毒蕈碱的舒张反应没有影响,但消除了(-)-尼古丁引起的舒张。这表明RAM中也含有介导抑制性NANC反应的烟碱乙酰胆碱受体(AchRs)。毒蕈碱和烟碱AchRs刺激以及电场刺激(EFS)诱导的舒张被河豚毒素完全消除,并且对一氧化氮(NO)合酶抑制剂N(G)-硝基-L-精氨酸(L-NOARG)也敏感,表明NO作为RAM中抑制性NANC递质发挥重要作用。所有研究的毒蕈碱拮抗剂均不影响组胺诱导的预收缩,但使(+)-毒蕈碱的浓度-反应曲线平行右移。Schild分析得出单位斜率的回归线,表明为竞争性拮抗作用。发现拮抗剂效能(pA2值)的以下顺序:11-([4-[4-(二乙氨基)-丁基]-1-哌啶基]-乙酰基-5,11-二氢-6H-吡啶并(2,3-b)(1,4)-苯二氮卓-6-酮盐酸盐(AQ-RA 741;8.08)= 辛巴辛(8.03)≥曲匹拉明(7.69)≥对氟六氢硅二苯胺(p-F-HHSiD;7.48)≥甲奥克明(7.30)≥哌仑西平(7.18)≥鸟苷哌仑西平(6.24)。将在RAM中测定的pA2值与已发表的关于毒蕈碱M1 - M4和m5受体结合研究的数据进行比较表明,介导RAM中NANC舒张的功能性毒蕈碱受体是M4亚型。综上所述,本研究获得的结果提供了令人信服的证据,即RAM中毒蕈碱刺激引起的舒张反应本质上是氮能的,并且由位于NANC神经元体树突上的毒蕈碱M4受体介导。因此,分离的RAM可作为功能性毒蕈碱M4受体模型。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验