Boissonnat P, de Lorgeril M, Perroux V, Salen P, Batt A M, Barthelemy J C, Brouard R, Serres E, Delaye J
Laboratoire de Physiologie, CHU Nord, Saint-Etienne, France.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1997;53(1):39-45. doi: 10.1007/s002280050334.
Previous uncontrolled studies have suggested an interaction between ticlopidine, a major antiplatelet agent, and cyclosporin in heart- and kidney-transplant recipients. The aims of this study were to examine in a randomised, double-blind fashion, the possible interaction between cyclosporin A and ticlopidine (250 mg per day) and the tolerability of this combination in heart-transplant recipients.
Twenty heart-transplant recipients were randomised into either a treated or a placebo group. Blood samples were drawn for time-course evaluation of cyclosporin blood levels over a period of 12 h, following the morning intake of cyclosporin and, for platelet aggregation studies, before and after 14 days of ticlopidine administration. Twenty four-hour urine samples were collected for 6-beta-hydroxycortisol measurements, before and after 14 days of ticlopidine.
Although given at half the recommended daily dosage, ticlopidine significantly reduced platelet aggregation. Pharmacokinetic parameters indicate that the bioavailability of cyclosporin A was not significantly modified by ticlopidine. However, one patient in the ticlopidine group was withdrawn because of a major fall in cyclosporin blood level within 3 days of treatment. Urinary excretion of 6-beta-hydroxycortisol was augmented after treatment in the ticlopidine group compared with the placebo group, suggesting that induction of drug metabolism might have occurred. Data also show quite a large intra-individual variability in cyclosporin bioavailability in the placebo group, suggesting that poor absorption of the drug formulation and/or poor compliance might have contributed to the decreased cyclosporin blood levels in the patient withdrawn from this study and in previous uncontrolled studies.
Cyclosporin bioavailability was not clearly modified by a half dosage of ticlopidine in this study. We, however, recommend closely monitoring cyclosporin blood levels when prescribing ticlopidine. Further studies will be needed with new formulations of cyclosporin or when using the full dosage of ticlopidine.
以往的非对照研究提示,主要抗血小板药物噻氯匹定与心脏和肾移植受者体内的环孢素之间存在相互作用。本研究旨在以随机、双盲方式,检验环孢素A与噻氯匹定(每日250毫克)之间可能存在的相互作用,以及这种联合用药在心脏移植受者中的耐受性。
20名心脏移植受者被随机分为治疗组或安慰剂组。在早晨服用环孢素后12小时内,采集血样用于环孢素血药浓度的时程评估,并在服用噻氯匹定14天前后采集血样用于血小板聚集研究。在服用噻氯匹定14天前后,收集24小时尿样用于检测6-β-羟基皮质醇。
尽管噻氯匹定的给药剂量仅为推荐日剂量的一半,但它仍显著降低了血小板聚集。药代动力学参数表明,噻氯匹定并未显著改变环孢素A的生物利用度。然而,噻氯匹定组有1例患者在治疗3天内环孢素血药浓度大幅下降,因此退出研究。与安慰剂组相比,噻氯匹定组治疗后6-β-羟基皮质醇的尿排泄量增加,提示可能发生了药物代谢诱导。数据还显示,安慰剂组中环孢素生物利用度存在相当大的个体内差异,这表明药物制剂吸收不良和/或依从性差可能导致了本研究中退出的患者以及以往非对照研究中环孢素血药浓度的降低。
本研究中,噻氯匹定半量给药并未明显改变环孢素的生物利用度。然而,我们建议在开具噻氯匹定处方时密切监测环孢素血药浓度。对于环孢素的新制剂或使用噻氯匹定全量时,还需要进一步研究。