Häggman M, Nordin B, Mattson S, Busch C
Department of Urology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Br J Urol. 1997 Oct;80(4):612-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.00409.x.
To further characterize patterns of tumour growth and the distribution of markers for the aggressiveness of prostate cancer by assessing the relationships among the volume of the 'index' tumour and that of the remaining foci, with pathological (pT) stage, histological grade and DNA ploidy, and with the amount of low- and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN).
Eighty-eight step-sectioned total prostatectomy specimens were analysed. The Gleason score, tumour stage and DNA ploidy (by flow cytometry) of multiple samples were determined. Tumour and PIN areas were outlined and their volumes estimated by computerized planimetry.
The pT stage, Gleason sum and DNA nondiploidy increased, and PIN volumes decreased, with increasing volume of the index tumour focus (P < 0.01), but did not differ significantly between uni- and multifocal tumours. However, PIN volumes were significantly larger in multifocal cases with an index tumour volume of > 3 mL than in unifocal tumours > 3 mL (P < 0.05). Small volume, unifocal tumours had little PIN. The most malignant features of each case were always represented in the index tumour but not generally in the remaining foci.
The volume distribution, related to multicentricity and its concomitant PIN volumes, indicates that large index tumours, uni- or multifocal, of medium or high grade, are associated with low PIN volumes. However, multifocal medium- and high-grade tumours with small index tumour volumes have higher PIN volumes. Small, single tumours are of low-grade and may represent the slowly progressing cancers possibly resembling those found in autopsy studies.
通过评估“索引”肿瘤体积与其余病灶体积之间的关系,以及与病理(pT)分期、组织学分级、DNA倍体,以及低级别和高级别前列腺上皮内瘤变(PIN)数量的关系,进一步明确前列腺癌肿瘤生长模式及侵袭性标志物的分布情况。
对88例前列腺全切连续切片标本进行分析。测定多个样本的Gleason评分、肿瘤分期及DNA倍体(采用流式细胞术)。勾勒出肿瘤和PIN区域,并通过计算机图像分析测量其体积。
随着索引肿瘤灶体积增大,pT分期、Gleason总分及DNA非整倍体率升高,PIN体积减小(P<0.01),单灶和多灶肿瘤之间无显著差异。然而,索引肿瘤体积>3 mL的多灶病例中PIN体积显著大于单灶肿瘤体积>3 mL的病例(P<0.05)。小体积单灶肿瘤PIN较少。每个病例最恶性的特征总是表现在索引肿瘤中,而其余病灶通常没有。
与多中心性及其伴随的PIN体积相关的体积分布表明,中等或高级别的大索引肿瘤,无论是单灶还是多灶,都与低PIN体积相关。然而,索引肿瘤体积小的多灶中高级别肿瘤PIN体积较高。小的单灶肿瘤级别较低,可能代表进展缓慢的癌症,类似于尸检研究中发现的癌症。