Natsch S, Hekster Y A, Keyser A, Deckers C L, Meinardi H, Renier W O
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Hospital of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Drug Saf. 1997 Oct;17(4):228-40. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199717040-00003.
In the last few years a number of new anticonvulsants have been introduced into clinical practice mainly as add-on therapy in patients who do not become seizure-free while receiving established anticonvulsants. Up to now, no single drug has been shown to be more effective at controlling seizures of a particular type than another, so other factors such as mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, dosage regimens or the spectrum of adverse drug reactions and interactions are used when making a choice between one agent and another. The mechanism of action of tiagabine and vigabatrin is very specific; both agents increase gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels through inhibition of reuptake and catabolism respectively. However, the mechanism of action of gabapentin is unknown and those of felbamate, lamotrigine and topiramate are not sufficiently clarified as yet, and may be multiple. Great advances have been made in improving the pharmacokinetic characteristics of these newer anticonvulsants. Gabapentin and vigabatrin exhibit relatively ideal pharmacokinetic properties as they are not bound to proteins, are excreted mostly unchanged in the urine and show linear pharmacokinetics. Lamotrigine possesses a highly variable elimination half-life depending on the co-medication. Tiagabine is highly protein bound and zonisamide shows nonlinear pharmacokinetics; both these drugs are extensively metabolised. Problematic drug interactions between newer anticonvulsants and other drugs in general occur rarely when these agents are given concomitantly. However, in common with most new drugs, there are very few data on the use of the newer anticonvulsants in women of childbearing age. Studies done so far on interactions with oral contraceptives used low anticonvulsant dosages for a very short time. The newer anticonvulsants elicit adverse reactions that, while not being unique, are particularly associated with that drug. For example, felbamate may cause aplastic anaemia and fulminant liver failure, lamotrigine is prone to cause skin rash, and oxcarbazepine may cause symptomatic hyponatraemia. Topiramate and zonisamide cause kidney stones, and vigabatrin may induce psychiatric syndromes. Although highly diverse in structure and activity, these newer drugs offer new possibilities for treating refractory epilepsy. However, since no single factor can dictate the choice of drug nor predict the success of treatment, prescribing of these rather expensive drugs has to depend upon careful consideration of the aims of treatment, the characteristics of the drug and the needs of the individual patient.
在过去几年里,一些新型抗惊厥药物已被引入临床实践,主要作为辅助治疗药物,用于那些在接受现有抗惊厥药物治疗时仍未实现无癫痫发作的患者。到目前为止,尚未发现单一药物在控制特定类型癫痫发作方面比其他药物更有效,因此在选择药物时,会考虑其他因素,如作用机制、药代动力学、给药方案或药物不良反应及相互作用的范围。替加宾和氨己烯酸的作用机制非常特殊;这两种药物分别通过抑制再摄取和分解代谢来提高γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)水平。然而,加巴喷丁的作用机制尚不清楚,而非氨酯、拉莫三嗪和托吡酯的作用机制尚未得到充分阐明,可能是多方面的。在改善这些新型抗惊厥药物的药代动力学特性方面已经取得了很大进展。加巴喷丁和氨己烯酸表现出相对理想的药代动力学特性,因为它们不与蛋白质结合,主要以原形经尿液排泄,并且呈现线性药代动力学。拉莫三嗪的消除半衰期高度可变,这取决于合并用药情况。替加宾与蛋白质高度结合,唑尼沙胺呈现非线性药代动力学;这两种药物都经过广泛代谢。一般来说,新型抗惊厥药物与其他药物之间的不良药物相互作用很少在同时使用这些药物时发生。然而,与大多数新药一样,关于育龄妇女使用新型抗惊厥药物的数据非常少。迄今为止,关于与口服避孕药相互作用的研究使用的抗惊厥药物剂量很低,且时间很短。新型抗惊厥药物会引发不良反应,这些反应虽然并非独一无二,但与该药物特别相关。例如,非氨酯可能导致再生障碍性贫血和暴发性肝衰竭,拉莫三嗪容易引起皮疹,奥卡西平可能导致症状性低钠血症。托吡酯和唑尼沙胺会导致肾结石,氨己烯酸可能诱发精神综合征。尽管这些新药在结构和活性上差异很大,但它们为治疗难治性癫痫提供了新的可能性。然而,由于没有单一因素能够决定药物的选择,也无法预测治疗的成功与否,因此在开具这些相当昂贵的药物处方时,必须仔细考虑治疗目标、药物特性和个体患者的需求。