• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗抑郁治疗对初级保健中医疗保健利用和成本的影响。

Effect of antidepressant therapy on health care utilization and costs in primary care.

作者信息

Croghan T W, Lair T J, Engelhart L, Crown W E, Copley-Merriman C, Melfi C A, Obenchain R L, Buesching D P

机构信息

Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 1997 Nov;48(11):1420-6. doi: 10.1176/ps.48.11.1420.

DOI:10.1176/ps.48.11.1420
PMID:9355169
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Four groups of patients receiving different antidepressant drugs in a primary care setting were compared in terms of duration of antidepressant therapy and health and mental health care utilization and costs.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the medical and pharmacy claims of an employed population and their families was conducted. A total of 1,242 patients with a diagnosis of depression were included in the analyses. The four antidepressant cohorts were fluoxetine (N = 799), trazodone (N = 89), the tricyclics amitriptyline and imipramine (N = 104), and the secondary amine tricyclics desipramine and nortriptyline (N = 250). The primary outcome measures were total health care charges, total charges for mental health services, and the pattern of antidepressant use. Secondary measures included charges for outpatient care and pharmacy and the number of outpatient visits. Data analysis involved use of two-stage multivariate regression modeling known as sample selection models.

RESULTS

Patients taking fluoxetine achieved higher rates of continuous use for at least six months compared with those taking the other drugs. After selection bias due to observed and unobserved characteristics and other confounding variables was adjusted for, no significant differences were found between drug cohorts in total medical charges.

CONCLUSIONS

Improvements in the process of care at no apparent increase in total charges appear possible through appropriate medication therapy.

摘要

目的

比较在基层医疗环境中接受不同抗抑郁药物治疗的四组患者在抗抑郁治疗持续时间、医疗保健和心理健康服务利用情况以及费用方面的差异。

方法

对在职人员及其家属的医疗和药房报销申请进行回顾性分析。共有1242例诊断为抑郁症的患者纳入分析。四组抗抑郁药物队列分别为氟西汀(N = 799)、曲唑酮(N = 89)、三环类药物阿米替林和丙咪嗪(N = 104)以及仲胺三环类药物地昔帕明和去甲替林(N = 250)。主要结局指标为总医疗费用、心理健康服务总费用以及抗抑郁药物使用模式。次要指标包括门诊护理和药房费用以及门诊就诊次数。数据分析采用两阶段多变量回归建模,即样本选择模型。

结果

与服用其他药物的患者相比,服用氟西汀的患者至少连续使用六个月的比例更高。在对观察到和未观察到的特征以及其他混杂变量导致的选择偏倚进行调整后,各药物队列在总医疗费用方面未发现显著差异。

结论

通过适当的药物治疗,在不明显增加总费用的情况下改善护理过程似乎是可行的。

相似文献

1
Effect of antidepressant therapy on health care utilization and costs in primary care.抗抑郁治疗对初级保健中医疗保健利用和成本的影响。
Psychiatr Serv. 1997 Nov;48(11):1420-6. doi: 10.1176/ps.48.11.1420.
2
Initial antidepressant choice in primary care. Effectiveness and cost of fluoxetine vs tricyclic antidepressants.初级保健中初始抗抑郁药物的选择。氟西汀与三环类抗抑郁药的疗效及成本比较
JAMA. 1996 Jun 26;275(24):1897-902.
3
Long-term outcomes of initial antidepressant drug choice in a "real world" randomized trial.“真实世界”随机试验中初始抗抑郁药物选择的长期结果
Arch Fam Med. 1999 Jul-Aug;8(4):319-25. doi: 10.1001/archfami.8.4.319.
4
Economic appraisal of citalopram in the management of single-episode depression.西酞普兰治疗单相抑郁症的经济学评估。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1999 Oct;19(5 Suppl 1):47S-54S. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199910001-00005.
5
Depression, health-related quality of life, and medical cost outcomes of receiving recommended levels of antidepressant treatment.接受推荐剂量抗抑郁治疗的抑郁症、健康相关生活质量及医疗费用结果
J Fam Pract. 1998 Dec;47(6):446-52.
6
Modelling the cost effectiveness of antidepressant treatment in primary care.初级保健中抗抑郁药治疗的成本效益建模。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1995 Dec;8(6):524-40. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199508060-00007.
7
Economic outcomes with antidepressant pharmacotherapy: a retrospective intent-to-treat analysis.抗抑郁药物治疗的经济结果:一项回顾性意向性治疗分析。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 2:13-7.
8
Fluoxetine and imipramine: are there differences in cost-utility for depression in primary care?氟西汀和米氮平:在基层医疗中治疗抑郁症的成本效益方面存在差异吗?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Feb;15(1):195-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00982.x.
9
Economic impact of non-persistence to antidepressant therapy in the Quebec community-dwelling elderly population.魁北克社区居住老年人群中抗抑郁治疗不持续的经济影响。
J Affect Disord. 2009 May;115(1-2):160-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.07.004. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
10
Acute medical costs of fluoxetine versus tricyclic antidepressants. A prospective multicentre study of antidepressant drug overdoses.氟西汀与三环类抗抑郁药的急性医疗费用。一项抗抑郁药物过量的前瞻性多中心研究。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Jan;11(1):48-55. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199711010-00006.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Affecting Non-Adherence among Patients Diagnosed with Unipolar Depression in a Psychiatric Department of a Tertiary Hospital in Kolkata, India.印度加尔各答一家三级医院精神科确诊的单相抑郁症患者中影响不依从性的因素
Depress Res Treat. 2013;2013:809542. doi: 10.1155/2013/809542. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
2
Measuring concurrent oral hypoglycemic and antidepressant adherence and clinical outcomes.测量同时服用口服降糖药和抗抑郁药的依从性和临床结局。
Am J Manag Care. 2013 Mar 1;19(3):e85-92.
3
Use of Bayesian net benefit regression model to examine the impact of generic drug entry on the cost effectiveness of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in elderly depressed patients.
使用贝叶斯净效益回归模型来检验仿制药进入对老年抑郁症患者中选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂成本效益的影响。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(10):843-62. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725100-00004.
4
Patterns of early adherence to the antidepressant citalopram among older primary care patients: the prospect study.老年初级保健患者中早期服用抗抑郁药西酞普兰的模式:前瞻性研究。
Int J Psychiatry Med. 2006;36(1):103-19. doi: 10.2190/DJH3-Y4R0-R3KG-JYCC.
5
A comparison of the direct costs and cost effectiveness of serotonin reuptake inhibitors and associated adverse drug reactions.5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂的直接成本、成本效益及相关药物不良反应比较
CNS Drugs. 2004;18(13):911-32. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200418130-00006.
6
A Case Report of Drug-Induced Dermatitis With Weekly Fluoxetine.一例每周服用氟西汀所致药物性皮炎的病例报告。
Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2002 Apr;4(2):78-79. doi: 10.4088/pcc.v04n0208b.
7
Treatment of recurrent depression: a sequential psychotherapeutic and psychopharmacological approach.复发性抑郁症的治疗:一种序贯心理治疗和心理药物治疗方法。
CNS Drugs. 2003;17(15):1109-17. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200317150-00005.
8
The need for an iterative process for assessing economic outcomes associated with SSRIs.需要一个迭代过程来评估与选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)相关的经济结果。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Sep;18(3):205-14. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200018030-00001.
9
Initial treatment choice in depression: impact on medical expenditures.抑郁症的初始治疗选择:对医疗支出的影响。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Apr;17(4):371-82. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200017040-00007.
10
Fluoxetine. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in depression.氟西汀。对其用于治疗抑郁症的药物经济学综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 May;13(5 Pt 1):543-61. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813050-00007.