Parsing schizophrenia with neurocognitive tests: evidence of stability and validity.

The stability and validity of a neurocognitive typology for schizophrenia were studied in 55 chronic patients who met DSMIII-R criteria for the illness. Subtypes were based on an earlier cluster analytic study by Heinrichs and Awad (1993) that utilized the following variables: IQ (WAIS-R), categories (Wisconsin Card Sorting Test), free recall intrusions (California Verbal Learning Test), and bilateral motor performance (Purdue Pegboard). Stability was examined by analyzing subtype assignment at the original assessment and 3 years later at follow-up. Stability over this interval was variable with an overall kappa of .45 and individual kappas from .12 to .66. Adjunct cognitive and clinical data gathered at follow-up provide evidence for the validity of several subtypes, especially in terms of their cognitive and functional differences. There was no evidence of symptom differences in this relatively asymptomatic medicated sample of patients. The results are discussed in terms of the possibility that several patterns of neurocognitive dysfunction may underlie schizophrenia, with implications for understanding the heterogeneity of the illness and its variable functional outcomes.