Choi S C
Department of Biostatistics, Medical College of Virginia/VCU, Richmond 23298-0032, USA.
J Biopharm Stat. 1997 Nov;7(4):533-43. doi: 10.1080/10543409708835205.
The group sequential tests (GST) are appropriate for performing interim analyses in clinical trials. Various GST are reviewed and compared in this paper in terms of the expected sample size, the maximum sample size, and other practical aspects. Also discussed are the p-values of the significant differences for GST. Common problems and difficulties of using GST in practice are examined. One problem is difficulties associated with the delayed data accumulated after a trial is terminated at an interim test. The GST with O'Brien-Fleming type of boundaries are found to be safe in dealing with delayed observations. Possible approaches for performing futility analyses are illustrated with examples. It is recommended that futility analysis with GST be built into the design of large clinical trials.
序贯检验(GST)适用于在临床试验中进行中期分析。本文根据预期样本量、最大样本量及其他实际方面,对各种序贯检验进行了综述和比较。还讨论了序贯检验显著差异的p值。研究了在实践中使用序贯检验的常见问题和困难。一个问题是与在中期试验终止后积累的延迟数据相关的困难。发现具有奥布赖恩 - 弗莱明边界类型的序贯检验在处理延迟观察时是安全的。通过实例说明了进行无效性分析的可能方法。建议在大型临床试验设计中纳入序贯检验的无效性分析。