Prakash A, Saksena S, Mathew P, Krol R B
Arrhythmia and Pacemaker Service, Eastern Heart Institute, Passaic, New Jersey, USA.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Oct;20(10 Pt 1):2434-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb06083.x.
Internal atrial defibrillation (IAD) has been extensively evaluated for clinical efficacy but the need for concomitant demand pacing and the effect of IAD shocks on pacemaker function is not well studied. We prospectively evaluated: (1) the incidence of bradycardia as a result of IAD shocks; and (2) effect of these shocks on functioning of implanted cardiac pacemakers. Consecutive consenting patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) requiring cardioversion or undergoing electrophysiological study were selected for IAD. IAD shocks were delivered using the right ventricle to right atrium (RV-RA), right ventricle to superior vena cava (RV-SVC), right atrium to axillary patch (RA-AX), and right atrium to left pulmonary artery or coronary sinus (RA-LPA/CS) lead configurations. Mean RR interval before and after the shocks and the time interval from shock delivery to first QRS complex were analyzed for unsuccessful and successful shocks. Pacing and sensing function was analyzed in patients with previously implanted pacemakers. Twenty-five patients, 18 men, mean age 67.9 +/- 10 years were included in the study. A total of 305 shocks (264 unsuccessful, 41 successful) were analyzed. For unsuccessful shocks the mean post-IAD shock RR interval (795 +/- 205 ms) and the time to first post-IAD shock QRS complex (970 +/- 438 ms) were both significantly greater than the pre-IAD shock RR interval (685 +/- 131 ms, P < 0.001). The increase in post-IAD shock RR interval and time to first post-IAD shock QRS complex was seen with all four lead configurations used. With successful shocks the mean post-IAD shock sinus cycle length (1,105 +/- 450 ms) and time to first post-IAD shock QRS complex (1,126 +/- 443 ms) were both also significantly greater than the pre-IAD shock RR interval (766 +/- 172 ms). Nine patients (36%) had episodes of significant bradycardia after shock delivery. Shocks of up to 20 J using the RA-LPA/CS lead configuration did not affect pacemaker function. IAD can result in transient bradycardia related to sinus and atrioventricular nodal effects requiring backup ventricular pacing. Shocks can be safely delivered using RA-LPA or RA-CS lead configurations in patients with implanted bipolar cardiac pacemakers.
心房内除颤(IAD)的临床疗效已得到广泛评估,但对同时需要按需起搏的必要性以及IAD电击对起搏器功能的影响尚未进行充分研究。我们进行了前瞻性评估:(1)IAD电击导致心动过缓的发生率;(2)这些电击对植入式心脏起搏器功能的影响。连续入选同意参加研究的需要复律或接受电生理检查的房颤(AF)患者进行IAD治疗。IAD电击采用右心室至右心房(RV-RA)、右心室至上腔静脉(RV-SVC)、右心房至腋部贴片(RA-AX)以及右心房至左肺动脉或冠状窦(RA-LPA/CS)的导联配置进行。分析了电击前后的平均RR间期以及电击发放至首个QRS波群的时间间隔,包括未成功和成功的电击。对先前植入起搏器的患者分析了起搏和感知功能。25例患者纳入研究,其中18例男性,平均年龄67.9±10岁。共分析了305次电击(264次未成功,41次成功)。对于未成功的电击,IAD电击后平均RR间期(795±205毫秒)以及IAD电击后首个QRS波群的时间(970±438毫秒)均显著长于IAD电击前的RR间期(685±131毫秒,P<0.001)。使用的所有四种导联配置均出现IAD电击后RR间期和IAD电击后首个QRS波群时间的增加。对于成功的电击,IAD电击后平均窦性周期长度(1105±450毫秒)以及IAD电击后首个QRS波群的时间(1126±443毫秒)也均显著长于IAD电击前的RR间期(766±172毫秒)。9例患者(36%)在电击发放后出现显著心动过缓发作。采用RA-LPA/CS导联配置进行高达20焦耳的电击不影响起搏器功能。IAD可导致与窦房结和房室结效应相关的短暂性心动过缓,需要备用心室起搏。对于植入双极心脏起搏器的患者,使用RA-LPA或RA-CS导联配置可安全地发放电击。