• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

昂丹司琼、甲泼尼龙和甲氧氯普胺联合用药对先前采用双联止吐治疗但在顺铂化疗中仍无法控制症状的患者的疗效。法国昂丹司琼研究小组。

The efficacy of a combination of ondansetron, methylprednisolone and metopimazine in patients previously uncontrolled with a dual antiemetic treatment in cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The French Ondansetron Study Group.

作者信息

Lebeau B, Depierre A, Giovannini M, Rivière A, Kaluzinski L, Votan B, Hédouin M, d'Allens H

机构信息

Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 1997 Sep;8(9):887-92. doi: 10.1023/a:1008276412559.

DOI:10.1023/a:1008276412559
PMID:9358940
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin is one of the most effective cytotoxic drugs used in the treatment of certain neoplasms, but is also one which most frequently induces nausea and vomiting. Combination of corticosteroids with ondansetron enables greater control of emesis than that obtained with ondansetron alone, but some patients still experience symptoms. The objective of this randomised, double-blind, multicentre, parallel group study was to examine the benefit of the addition of metopimazine (MPZ), a dopamine receptor antagonist, to the combination of ondansetron + methylprednisolone (O + M) in the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting in patients uncontrolled [i.e., at least one emetic episode (vomiting and/or retching) or moderate or severe nausea] during their previous course of cisplatin based chemotherapy, despite antiemetic treatment with a combination of a 5-hydroxytryptamine3 receptor antagonist (5HT3) with a corticosteroid. The impact of the treatment on the patients' quality of life was also evaluated using two specific questionnaires the FLIC (Functional Living Index for Cancer), and the FLIE (Functional Living Index for Emesis).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The intent-to-treat population consisted of 338 patients; 168 patients received the triple combination of ondansetron, methylprednisolone and metopimazine (O + M + MPZ), and 170 patients received ondansetron plus methylprednisolone (O + M). Tumour type was comparable in the two treatment groups, the most prevalent being lung cancer. Patients in group O + M + MPZ received ondansetron as an 8 mg intravenous injection prior to chemotherapy on day 1 followed by 8 mg tablets b.i.d. from D2 to D3, methylprednisolone as a 120 mg intravenous injection prior to chemotherapy on D1 and followed by 16 mg tablets b.i.d. from D2 to D3, and metopimazine as a 40 mg intravenous injection prior to chemotherapy on D1 and followed by 15 mg capsules b.i.d. on D2 to D3. Patients in group O + M received treatment with ondansetron and methylprednisolone as above.

RESULTS

Analysis of the primary efficacy criterion (absence of emetic episode throughout the course of chemotherapy) revealed a success rate of 53% in the group receiving O + M + MPZ and 38% in the group receiving O + M (P = 0.008). Analysis of the secondary efficacy criteria (nausea grade, number of emetic episodes and global patient satisfaction on D1 and from D2 to D3) showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups, in favour of the O + M + MPZ treatment. The scores obtained with the FLIC and FLIE questionnaires did not reveal any significant differences between the two groups. Treatment was well tolerated in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The study showed that the addition of MPZ to the combination O + M was an effective and well tolerated antiemetic treatment, with a 15% increase in efficacy compared to the combination in patients not controlled during their previous course of chemotherapy. The addition of metopimazine to existing regimens containing 5HT3 receptor antagonist and steroid combination should be considered for patients who fail on their previous course.

摘要

背景

顺铂是治疗某些肿瘤最有效的细胞毒性药物之一,但也是最常引起恶心和呕吐的药物之一。皮质类固醇与昂丹司琼联合使用比单独使用昂丹司琼能更好地控制呕吐,但仍有一些患者会出现症状。这项随机、双盲、多中心、平行组研究的目的是检验在昂丹司琼 + 甲泼尼龙(O + M)联合用药基础上加用多巴胺受体拮抗剂甲氧氯普胺(MPZ),对既往接受基于顺铂的化疗过程中尽管使用了5-羟色胺3受体拮抗剂(5HT3)与皮质类固醇联合进行止吐治疗但仍未得到控制(即至少有一次呕吐发作(呕吐和/或干呕)或中度或重度恶心)的患者预防顺铂引起的恶心和呕吐的益处。还使用两份特定问卷,即癌症功能生活指数(FLIC)和呕吐功能生活指数(FLIE)评估了该治疗对患者生活质量的影响。

患者与方法

意向性治疗人群包括338例患者;168例患者接受昂丹司琼、甲泼尼龙和甲氧氯普胺三联组合(O + M + MPZ),170例患者接受昂丹司琼加甲泼尼龙(O + M)。两个治疗组的肿瘤类型具有可比性,最常见的是肺癌。O + M + MPZ组患者在第1天化疗前接受8 mg昂丹司琼静脉注射,随后从第2天至第3天每日两次口服8 mg片剂;在第1天化疗前接受120 mg甲泼尼龙静脉注射,随后从第2天至第3天每日两次口服16 mg片剂;在第1天化疗前接受40 mg甲氧氯普胺静脉注射,随后从第2天至第3天每日两次口服15 mg胶囊。O + M组患者接受上述昂丹司琼和甲泼尼龙治疗。

结果

对主要疗效标准(化疗全过程无呕吐发作)的分析显示,接受O + M + MPZ组的成功率为53%,接受O + M组的成功率为38%(P = 0.008)。对次要疗效标准(恶心程度、呕吐发作次数以及第1天和第2天至第3天患者总体满意度)的分析显示,两组之间存在统计学显著差异,但更有利于O + M + MPZ治疗。FLIC和FLIE问卷获得的分数未显示两组之间有任何显著差异。两组对治疗的耐受性均良好。

结论

该研究表明,在O + M联合用药基础上加用MPZ是一种有效且耐受性良好的止吐治疗方法,与既往化疗过程中未得到控制的患者使用的联合用药相比,疗效提高了15%。对于既往治疗失败的患者,应考虑在现有含5HT3受体拮抗剂和类固醇联合用药方案中加用甲氧氯普胺。

相似文献

1
The efficacy of a combination of ondansetron, methylprednisolone and metopimazine in patients previously uncontrolled with a dual antiemetic treatment in cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The French Ondansetron Study Group.昂丹司琼、甲泼尼龙和甲氧氯普胺联合用药对先前采用双联止吐治疗但在顺铂化疗中仍无法控制症状的患者的疗效。法国昂丹司琼研究小组。
Ann Oncol. 1997 Sep;8(9):887-92. doi: 10.1023/a:1008276412559.
2
[Improvement in the control of chemotherapy induced emesis with ondansetron, methylprednisolone and lorazepam combination in patients treated by a moderate emetic treatment and uncontrolled by a previous antiemetic combination].
Bull Cancer. 2000 Jun;87(6):491-7.
3
Randomized, double-blind comparison of ondansetron versus ondansetron plus metopimazine as antiemetic prophylaxis during platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 1997 Apr;15(4):1690-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.4.1690.
4
[Value of the combination of oral ondansetron with methylprednisolone as soon as the first cure in mild emetogenic chemotherapy. Groupe français d'étude de l'ondansétron].
Bull Cancer. 1997 Aug;84(8):781-7.
5
Ondansetron plus metopimazine compared with ondansetron alone in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.
N Engl J Med. 1993 Apr 15;328(15):1076-80. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199304153281502.
6
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of combinations of metopimazine or ondansetron with methylprednisolone in the prevention of delayed emesis in patients receiving chemotherapy.甲氧氯普胺或昂丹司琼与甲泼尼龙联合用药预防化疗患者迟发性呕吐的疗效和安全性比较
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Nov;21(11):1763-71. doi: 10.1185/030079905X61802.
7
Randomized, double-blind trial comparing the antiemetic effect of tropisetron plus metopimazine with tropisetron plus placebo in patients receiving multiple cycles of multiple-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy.一项随机双盲试验,比较托烷司琼加甲哌氯丙嗪与托烷司琼加安慰剂在接受多周期多日顺铂化疗患者中的止吐效果。
Support Care Cancer. 2007 Apr;15(4):417-26. doi: 10.1007/s00520-006-0158-y. Epub 2006 Nov 9.
8
Ondansetron suppository: an effective treatment for the prevention of emetic disorders induced by cisplatin-based chemotherapy. French Ondansetron Study Group.
Oral Oncol. 1997 Sep;33(5):354-8. doi: 10.1016/s1368-8375(97)00006-7.
9
A multicentre, double-blind study comparing placebo, ondansetron and ondansetron plus dexamethasone for the control of cisplatin-induced delayed emesis. Ondansetron Delayed Emesis Study Group.一项比较安慰剂、昂丹司琼及昂丹司琼联合地塞米松用于控制顺铂所致迟发性呕吐的多中心、双盲研究。昂丹司琼迟发性呕吐研究组。
Ann Oncol. 1996 Nov;7(9):945-52. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a010798.
10
Methylprednisolone enhances the efficacy of ondansetron in acute and delayed cisplatin-induced emesis over at least three cycles. Ondansetron Study Group.甲基强的松龙在至少三个周期内可增强昂丹司琼对顺铂所致急性和迟发性呕吐的疗效。昂丹司琼研究组。
Br J Cancer. 1994 Dec;70(6):1171-5. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.467.

引用本文的文献

1
Meta-analysis of adjunctive non-NK1 receptor antagonist medications for the control of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.辅助性非NK1受体拮抗剂药物用于控制急性和延迟性化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的荟萃分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Jan;23(1):213-22. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2392-z. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
2
Optimizing emetic control in children receiving antineoplastic therapy: beyond the guidelines.优化接受抗肿瘤治疗的儿童的止吐控制:超越指南。
Paediatr Drugs. 2010;12(1):51-61. doi: 10.2165/11316190-000000000-00000.
3
A review of patient self-report tools for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.
化疗引起的恶心和呕吐患者自我报告工具综述
Support Care Cancer. 2008 Nov;16(11):1213-29. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0428-y. Epub 2008 Jun 13.
4
Oral ondansetron is highly active as rescue antiemetic treatment for moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: results of a randomized phase II study.口服昂丹司琼作为中度致吐性化疗的解救性抗呕吐治疗具有高度活性:一项随机II期研究的结果
Support Care Cancer. 2008 Dec;16(12):1375-80. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0438-9. Epub 2008 May 14.
5
Randomized, double-blind trial comparing the antiemetic effect of tropisetron plus metopimazine with tropisetron plus placebo in patients receiving multiple cycles of multiple-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy.一项随机双盲试验,比较托烷司琼加甲哌氯丙嗪与托烷司琼加安慰剂在接受多周期多日顺铂化疗患者中的止吐效果。
Support Care Cancer. 2007 Apr;15(4):417-26. doi: 10.1007/s00520-006-0158-y. Epub 2006 Nov 9.
6
A pilot study of ondansetron plus metopimazine vs. ondansetron monotherapy in children receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a Bayesian randomized serial N-of-1 trials design.昂丹司琼联合美托哌丙嗪与昂丹司琼单药治疗接受高致吐性化疗儿童的初步研究:贝叶斯随机系列N-of-1试验设计
Support Care Cancer. 2006 Mar;14(3):268-76. doi: 10.1007/s00520-005-0875-7. Epub 2005 Jul 29.
7
Impact of nausea and vomiting on quality of life in cancer patients during chemotherapy.化疗期间恶心呕吐对癌症患者生活质量的影响。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Sep 17;1:46. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-46.
8
Options for the prevention and management of acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in children.儿童急性化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的预防与管理方案
Paediatr Drugs. 2003;5(9):597-613. doi: 10.2165/00148581-200305090-00003.
9
Nausea and emesis: still an unsolved problem in cancer patients?恶心与呕吐:癌症患者中仍未解决的问题?
Support Care Cancer. 2002 Mar;10(2):85-7. doi: 10.1007/s00520-001-0339-7. Epub 2002 Jan 31.