Olver I, Paska W, Depierre A, Seitz J F, Stewart D J, Goedhals L, McQuade B, McRae J, Wilkinson J R
Royal Adelaide Hospital, Australia.
Ann Oncol. 1996 Nov;7(9):945-52. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a010798.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of oral ondansetron, given alone or in combination with dexamethasone in the control of cisplatin-induced delayed emesis.
This was an international, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel group study. A total of 640 chemotherapy-naïve patients received ondansetron 8 mg i.v. and dexamethasone 20 mg i.v. for the control of acute emesis prior to cisplatin (> or = 70 mg/m2) on day 1. Patients who were not rescued or withdrawn on day 1 were to be randomised 24 hours after the start of cisplatin administration to one of four groups; group I placebo oral (p.o.), twice daily (bd) on days 2-6 (n = 125); group II ondansetron (8 mg p.o. bd) on days 2/3 followed by placebo (p.o. bd) on days 4-6 (n = 199); group III ondansetron (8 mg p.o. bd) on days 2-6 (n = 214); group IV ondansetron (8 mg p.o. bd) plus dexamethasone (4 mg p.o. bd) on days 2-6 (n = 66).
On day 1, 81% of patients had complete control of acute emesis, with 68% having no emesis and no nausea. Over days 2/3 and over days 2-6, significantly more patients receiving ondansetron plus dexamethasone (group IV) reported no emesis and no nausea (49% and 45%, respectively) compared to ondansetron alone (32% and 27%, respectively) or placebo (group I; 33% and 27%, respectively; P < 0.05 for all pairwise comparisons). There were no significant differences in the control of emesis over days 2/3, where 61% of patients had complete emetic control (0 emetic episodes) with ondansetron plus dexamethasone (group IV), 54% with ondansetron (groups II + III) and 49% with placebo (group I). In the distribution of nausea grades, ondansetron plus dexamethasone (group IV) was significantly superior to ondansetron (groups II + III); P = 0.037) and placebo (group I; P = 0.013) over days 2/3. Over days 2-6 there were no significant differences in the control of emesis, however a comparison of the distribution of nausea grades over days 2-6 showed ondansetron plus dexamethasone (group IV) to be significantly superior to ondansetron (group III; P = 0.043) and placebo (group I; P = 0.024). All treatments were well tolerated and no unexpected drug-related adverse events were reported. There were no differences in the overall incidence of adverse events between the active treatment groups or placebo. Constipation and headache, recognised side effects of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, were the most commonly reported adverse events with the incidence of constipation with ondansetron alone (group III) being significantly greater than with over days 2-6 (14% vs. 6%; P = 0.030).
In contrast to some previous investigations, in this study, ondansetron alone appears to have a minor role in the control of cisplatin-induced delayed emesis and nausea. In conclusion, the combination of oral ondansetron plus dexamethasone is superior to ondansetron and to placebo.
本研究旨在调查单独使用口服昂丹司琼或与地塞米松联合使用在控制顺铂引起的迟发性呕吐方面的疗效和安全性。
这是一项国际多中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的平行组研究。共有640例未接受过化疗的患者在第1天接受8 mg静脉注射昂丹司琼和20 mg静脉注射地塞米松以控制顺铂(≥70 mg/m²)引起的急性呕吐。在第1天未得到解救或退出研究的患者,在顺铂给药开始24小时后随机分为四组之一;第一组口服安慰剂,第2 - 6天每日两次(bid)(n = 125);第二组在第2/3天服用昂丹司琼(8 mg口服bid),随后在第4 - 6天服用安慰剂(口服bid)(n = 199);第三组在第2 - 6天服用昂丹司琼(8 mg口服bid)(n = 214);第四组在第2 - 6天服用昂丹司琼(8 mg口服bid)加地塞米松(4 mg口服bid)(n = 66)。
在第1天,81%的患者急性呕吐得到完全控制,68%的患者无呕吐且无恶心。在第2/3天以及第2 - 6天,与单独使用昂丹司琼(分别为32%和27%)或安慰剂(第一组;分别为33%和27%;所有两两比较P < 0.05)相比,接受昂丹司琼加地塞米松(第四组)的患者报告无呕吐且无恶心的比例显著更高(分别为49%和45%)。在第2/3天呕吐控制方面无显著差异,接受昂丹司琼加地塞米松(第四组)的患者中有61%呕吐得到完全控制(0次呕吐发作),接受昂丹司琼的患者(第二组 + 第三组)为54%,接受安慰剂的患者(第一组)为49%。在恶心分级分布方面,昂丹司琼加地塞米松(第四组)在第2/3天显著优于昂丹司琼(第二组 + 第三组;P = 0.037)和安慰剂(第一组;P = 0.013)。在第2 - 6天呕吐控制方面无显著差异,然而在第2 - 6天恶心分级分布的比较显示昂丹司琼加地塞米松(第四组)显著优于昂丹司琼(第三组;P = 0.043)和安慰剂(第一组;P = 0.024)。所有治疗耐受性良好,未报告意外的药物相关不良事件。活性治疗组与安慰剂组之间不良事件的总体发生率无差异。便秘和头痛是5 - HT3受体拮抗剂公认的副作用,是最常报告的不良事件,单独使用昂丹司琼(第三组)在第2 - 6天的便秘发生率显著高于其他组(14%对6%;P = 0.030)。
与一些先前的研究不同,在本研究中,单独使用昂丹司琼在控制顺铂引起的迟发性呕吐和恶心方面似乎作用较小。总之,口服昂丹司琼加地塞米松的联合用药优于昂丹司琼和安慰剂。