VanBlankenstein T, Botzler R G
Department of Wildlife, Humboldt State University, Arcata, California 95521-8299, USA.
J Wildl Dis. 1996 Oct;32(4):714-5. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-32.4.714.
We tested the null hypothesis that anesthetizing meadow voles (Microtus californicus) and brushing them vigorously for ectoparasites would have no effect on the later recapture of these voles. Voles were trapped from 6 December 1993 to 10 January 1994 at Faye Slough Wildlife Area near Eureka, Humboldt County, California (USA). Alternate trapped voles were anesthetized with ethyl ether and brushed vigorously for ectoparasites. There was no significant difference in the frequency of recapture nor in the time to first recapture between those voles anesthetized and brushed, compared to control animals.
我们检验了零假设,即麻醉加州田鼠(Microtus californicus)并用力刷洗它们以去除体外寄生虫,对这些田鼠后来的再次捕获率没有影响。1993年12月6日至1994年1月10日期间,在美国加利福尼亚州洪堡县尤里卡附近的费耶斯劳野生动物保护区诱捕田鼠。每隔一只被诱捕的田鼠用乙醚麻醉,然后用力刷洗以去除体外寄生虫。与对照动物相比,麻醉并刷洗过的田鼠在再次捕获频率和首次再次捕获时间上均无显著差异。