Griebenow R, Pittrow D B, Weidinger G, Mueller E, Mutschler E, Welzel D
Department of Internal Medicine II, University of Cologne, Germany.
Blood Press. 1997 Sep;6(5):299-306. doi: 10.3109/08037059709062086.
The concept of initiating treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension with a low-dose combination of reserpine and the thiazide clopamide in comparison to monotherapy with an ACE inhibitor was investigated. A total of 127 adult outpatients with diastolic blood pressure between 100 and 114 mmHg were randomized into this double-blind, parallel group study. After a 2-week wash-out period and a subsequent 2-week placebo run-in period, they were allocated to once-daily treatment with 0.1 mg reserpine plus 5 mg clopamide (R/C), or 5 mg enalapril. If diastolic blood pressure was not normalized after 3 weeks of therapy (i.e. DBP < 90 mmHg), the dosage was doubled from week 4 to 6. The primary efficacy variables were the change from baseline in mean sitting diastolic and systolic blood pressure (DBP/SBP) after 3 weeks of therapy. Secondary variables included the change in DBP and SBP after 6 weeks of therapy, the BP normalization rates at 3 and 6 weeks and, concerning tolerability, the rates of adverse events after 6 weeks of therapy. An intent-to-treat analysis was performed. The reserpine/ clopamide and enalapril groups did not differ with regard to demographic and baseline characteristics (mean age 57 or 58 years, respectively; 63% or 56% males, respectively; mean SBP/DBP after the 2-week placebo period = 156 mmHg/104 mmHg in both groups). After 3 weeks of treatment with one capsule daily, mean SBP/DBP reduction from baseline (24 h after last medication intake) in the R/C combination group was -19.6/ -17.0 mmHg, in the enalapril group -6.1/ -9.5 mmHg (between-group comparison: 2p < 0.01 for both parameters). The normalization rates for DBP (< 90 mmHg) were 64.1% (R/C) and 28.6% (enalapril) (2p < 0.01). Adverse events that were considered possibly or definitely drug-related by the investigator were noted in 11 patients (17.2%) in the R/C group and in 9 patients (14.3%) in the enalapril group (NS). Two patients in the enalapril group discontinued the study prematurely due to adverse events (cough; skin eruption). In the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension, a low-dose combination of reserpine and clopamide once a day is considerably more effective than, and as tolerable as, 5-10 mg of enalapril once a day. These findings suggest that treatment with a combination of different antihypertensives with different modes of action in low doses is a rational alternative to conventional monotherapy in the first-line treatment of hypertension. Besides, the "old" reserpine-diuretic regimen also in these days appears to be a rational alternative to "modern" monotherapies.
研究了与使用血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂单药治疗相比,用低剂量利血平和噻嗪类氯噻酰胺联合治疗轻至中度高血压的概念。总共127名舒张压在100至114mmHg之间的成年门诊患者被随机纳入这项双盲、平行组研究。经过2周的洗脱期和随后2周的安慰剂导入期后,他们被分配接受每日一次0.1mg利血平加5mg氯噻酰胺(R/C)或5mg依那普利的治疗。如果治疗3周后舒张压未恢复正常(即舒张压<90mmHg),则从第4周开始至第6周将剂量加倍。主要疗效变量是治疗3周后平均坐位舒张压和收缩压(DBP/SBP)相对于基线的变化。次要变量包括治疗6周后DBP和SBP的变化、3周和6周时的血压正常化率,以及关于耐受性方面,治疗6周后的不良事件发生率。进行了意向性治疗分析。利血平/氯噻酰胺组和依那普利组在人口统计学和基线特征方面无差异(平均年龄分别为57岁或58岁;男性分别为63%或56%;两组在2周安慰剂期后的平均SBP/DBP均为156mmHg/104mmHg)。每日服用一粒胶囊治疗3周后,R/C联合治疗组相对于基线(最后一次服药后24小时)的平均SBP/DBP降低值为-19.6/-17.0mmHg,依那普利组为-6.1/-9.5mmHg(组间比较:两个参数的p<0.01)。DBP(<90mmHg)的正常化率分别为64.1%(R/C)和28.6%(依那普利)(p<0.01)。研究者认为可能或肯定与药物相关的不良事件在R/C组中有11例患者(17.2%)出现,依那普利组有9例患者(14.3%)出现(无显著性差异)。依那普利组有2例患者因不良事件(咳嗽;皮疹)提前退出研究。在轻至中度高血压的治疗中,低剂量利血平和氯噻酰胺每日一次联合治疗比每日5-10mg依那普利显著更有效且耐受性相当。这些发现表明,在高血压一线治疗中,低剂量使用具有不同作用方式的不同抗高血压药物联合治疗是传统单药治疗的合理替代方案。此外,如今“老的”利血平-利尿剂方案似乎也是“现代”单药治疗的合理替代方案。