Lacourcière Y
Hypertension Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Clin Ther. 2000 Oct;22(10):1213-24. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(00)83064-7.
Blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is the preferred mechanism of action for controlling hypertension in select groups of patients, including those with diabetic nephropathy and heart failure. Currently, 2 classes of drugs work by blocking the RAAS, albeit by differing mechanisms: angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II angiotensin type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs).
The goal of this study was to assess the comparative efficacy and tolerability of the ARB irbesartan and the ACE inhibitor enalapril in patients > or = 65 years of age with mild to moderate hypertension (sitting diastolic blood pressure [DBP], 95 to 110 mm Hg).
Elderly (> or = 65 years of age) patients were recruited from 26 Canadian study centers for a randomized, double-blind, 8-week clinical trial. Exclusion criteria included sitting DBP >110 mm Hg or sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) >200 mm Hg, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, cardiac procedure, stroke, or transient ischemic attack within 6 months of randomization, as well as other preexisting or present severe medical or psychologic conditions. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a single daily dose of irbesartan 150 mg (n = 70) or enalapril 10 mg (n = 71) with treatment doses of study drugs doubled at week 4 for sitting DBP > or = 90 mm Hg. Reductions from baseline blood pressure measurements at trough (24 +/- 3 hours after the last dose of medication) were assessed for sitting DBP and sitting SBP. Comparative tolerability to study drugs was also assessed.
The intent-to-treat analysis demonstrated similar reductions at week 8 in both DBP and SBP for both groups. For the primary efficacy analysis of sitting DBP, there was a mean reduction from baseline of 9.6 mm Hg and 9.8 mm Hg for the irbesartan and enalapril groups, respectively (P = 0.93). The mean reduction from baseline in sitting SBP was 10.1 mm Hg and 11.6 mm Hg for the irbesartan and enalapril groups, respectively (P = 0.54). Normalization rates (sitting DBP <90 mm Hg) at week 8 did not differ between groups (52.9% in the irbesartan group and 54.9% in the enalapril group; P = 0.81). No statistical difference existed between the 2 groups with respect to serious adverse events or discontinuations due to adverse events. Irbesartan was associated with a significantly lower incidence of cough than was enalapril (4.3% vs 15.5%, respectively; P = 0.046).
Irbesartan is an effective and well-tolerated antihypertensive for elderly patients with mild to moderate hypertension. This study establishes that irbesartan has better tolerability than enalapril with respect to cough and suggests that irbesartan is as effective at lowering blood pressure but better tolerated than an ACE inhibitor in hypertensive patients > or = 65 years of age.
阻断肾素 - 血管紧张素 - 醛固酮系统(RAAS)是控制特定患者群体高血压的首选作用机制,这些患者包括患有糖尿病肾病和心力衰竭的患者。目前,有两类药物通过阻断RAAS发挥作用,尽管作用机制不同:血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂和血管紧张素II 1型受体阻滞剂(ARB)。
本研究的目的是评估ARB厄贝沙坦和ACE抑制剂依那普利在年龄≥65岁的轻度至中度高血压(坐位舒张压[DBP]为95至110 mmHg)患者中的相对疗效和耐受性。
从26个加拿大研究中心招募老年(≥65岁)患者进行一项随机、双盲、为期8周的临床试验。排除标准包括坐位DBP>110 mmHg或坐位收缩压(SBP)>200 mmHg、心绞痛、心肌梗死、心脏手术、中风或随机分组前6个月内的短暂性脑缺血发作,以及其他已存在或当前存在的严重医学或心理状况。患者被随机分配接受每日单剂量厄贝沙坦150 mg(n = 70)或依那普利10 mg(n = 71),对于坐位DBP≥90 mmHg的患者,研究药物的治疗剂量在第4周加倍。在谷值(最后一剂药物后24±3小时)评估坐位DBP和坐位SBP相对于基线血压测量值的降低情况。还评估了对研究药物的相对耐受性。
意向性分析表明,两组在第8周时DBP和SBP的降低情况相似。对于坐位DBP的主要疗效分析,厄贝沙坦组和依那普利组相对于基线的平均降低值分别为9.6 mmHg和9.8 mmHg(P = 0.93)。厄贝沙坦组和依那普利组坐位SBP相对于基线的平均降低值分别为10.1 mmHg和11.6 mmHg(P = 0.54)。两组在第8周时的达标率(坐位DBP<90 mmHg)无差异(厄贝沙坦组为52.9%,依那普利组为54.9%;P = 0.81)。两组在严重不良事件或因不良事件停药方面无统计学差异。厄贝沙坦引起咳嗽的发生率显著低于依那普利(分别为4.3%和15.5%;P = 0.046)。
厄贝沙坦对轻度至中度高血压老年患者是一种有效且耐受性良好的抗高血压药物。本研究表明,厄贝沙坦在咳嗽方面的耐受性优于依那普利,并提示在年龄≥65岁的高血压患者中,厄贝沙坦在降低血压方面同样有效,但耐受性优于ACE抑制剂。