Suppr超能文献

Detection of access strictures and outlet stenoses in vascular accesses. Which test is best?

作者信息

Besarab A, Lubkowski T, Frinak S, Ramanathan S, Escobar F

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

ASAIO J. 1997 Sep-Oct;43(5):M543-7.

PMID:9360102
Abstract

The location of stenoses within an access may influence the diagnostic value of access monitoring tests. Whereas decreasing access flow (QACC) should occur with both venous outlet stenoses and strictures within the body of the access, normalized intra-access venous pressure (vPIA/MAP) depends on location of the venous needle relative to the lesion. The authors determined the value of vPIA/MAP and direct measurement of percent access recirculation (AR) and QACC in detecting venous outlet stenoses and strictures. Abnormal access studies were evaluated by Doppler ultrasound and fistulography. Well functioning grafts and arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) have no AR; QACC averages 1,101 +/- 26 and 1,073 +/- 35 mL/min, and vPIA/MAP ratios are 0.34 and 0.16, respectively. Venous outlet stenoses (n = 36) or strictures (n = 32) were detected before thrombosis or intervention in 172 vascular accesses at risk. QACC in accesses with stricture was significantly lower than in those with venous outlet stenosis (361 +/- 11 vs 526 +/- 43 ml/min), as was less than prescribed blood flow (423 +/- 7 ml/min). AR was not detected in any access with stricture and in only 4 of 36 accesses with outlet stenosis. vPIA/MAP was elevated with venous outlet stenosis but not with strictures. The findings of QACC being less than blood pump flow without AR by dilution methods differentiated strictures from venous outlet stenoses.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验