Vivian D, Malone J
Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Stony Brook, USA.
Violence Vict. 1997 Spring;12(1):3-18.
This study uses a gender-specific approach to investigate the association among relationship factors, depressive symptomatology and husbands' marital violence in 327 couples who attended a marital therapy clinic. Both spouses reports were used to group couples according to husbands' verbal (VA), mild physical (MA), and severe physical (SA) aggression as measured by the Conflict Tactics Scale (Straus, 1979). Frequency of aggression and spouses' perceptions about their partners' communication skills during conflict (i.e., use of hostile, verbally aggressive and avoidant conflict styles) were different for all groups. Reports on marital quality, conflict management style, cognitions about marriage, and individual affective state were more negative for both spouses when husbands were severely physically aggressive. Wives in the SA group were most likely to believe that partners cannot change. Discriminant function analysis provided substantial prediction of group membership when husbands were verbally or severely aggressive, but weaker prediction when husbands engaged in mild physical aggression. The limits of current measures of dyadic processes for marital violence research are discussed.
本研究采用针对性别的方法,对327对前往婚姻治疗诊所的夫妻进行调查,以探究关系因素、抑郁症状与丈夫婚姻暴力之间的关联。根据冲突策略量表(施特劳斯,1979年)所衡量的丈夫言语攻击(VA)、轻度身体攻击(MA)和重度身体攻击(SA)情况,利用夫妻双方的报告对夫妻进行分组。所有组别的攻击频率以及夫妻双方对伴侣在冲突期间沟通技巧的认知(即使用敌对、言语攻击性和回避性冲突方式)均有所不同。当丈夫存在重度身体攻击行为时,夫妻双方在婚姻质量、冲突管理方式、对婚姻的认知以及个人情感状态方面的报告更为负面。SA组中的妻子最有可能认为伴侣无法改变。判别函数分析在丈夫存在言语攻击或重度攻击行为时,能够对所属组别进行有效预测,但在丈夫存在轻度身体攻击行为时,预测能力较弱。本文还讨论了当前用于婚姻暴力研究的二元过程测量方法的局限性。