• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用非磨砂纱布减少腹腔粘连形成

Reduction of intraperitoneal adhesion formation by use of non-abrasive gauze.

作者信息

van den Tol M P, van Stijn I, Bonthuis F, Marquet R L, Jeekel J

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Dijkzigt, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 1997 Oct;84(10):1410-5.

PMID:9361601
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adhesion formation is potentially harmful. Surgical swabs may contribute to adhesions by trauma to the peritoneum. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether standard surgical gauze (Medipres) has an adhesion-promoting effect, and to determine whether a soft textile (Fastsorb), used in the electronics industry, might be less traumatic and therefore lead to less adhesion formation.

METHODS

A reproducible rat model allowing semiquantitative scoring of adhesion formation was used. Three different adhesion models representing increasing degrees of peritoneal trauma (minimal, moderate and severe) were employed. The model inflicting minimal peritoneal trauma was combined with standardized rubbing of the peritoneum with surgical gauze or non-surgical textile.

RESULTS

Minimal peritoneal trauma resulted in a significantly lower mean adhesion percentage (21 per cent) than moderate (44 per cent) or severe (60 per cent) peritoneal trauma (P < or = 0.005). Rubbing of the peritoneum with surgical gauze after minimal peritoneal trauma induced significantly more adhesion formation (58 versus 23 per cent, P < 0.0001). After minimal peritoneal trauma, rubbing with surgical gauze produced significantly more adhesions than rubbing with non-surgical textile (63 versus 19 per cent, P < 0.0001). Moreover, rubbing the peritoneum with non-surgical textile after minimal peritoneal trauma did not induce any additional adhesion formation (35 versus 24 per cent, P = 0.23).

CONCLUSION

The extent of adhesion formation correlates significantly with the degree of peritoneal damage. Standard surgical gauze is traumatizing to the peritoneum and promotes adhesion formation whereas a less abrasive non-surgical textile does not.

摘要

背景

粘连形成可能具有潜在危害。手术拭子可能因对腹膜造成创伤而导致粘连。本研究的目的是评估标准手术纱布(Medipres)是否具有促进粘连的作用,并确定电子行业使用的一种柔软织物(Fastsorb)是否创伤性较小,从而导致较少的粘连形成。

方法

使用一种可重复的大鼠模型,该模型允许对粘连形成进行半定量评分。采用了三种不同的粘连模型,分别代表腹膜创伤程度的增加(轻度、中度和重度)。造成轻度腹膜创伤的模型与用手术纱布或非手术织物对腹膜进行标准化摩擦相结合。

结果

与中度(44%)或重度(60%)腹膜创伤相比,轻度腹膜创伤导致的平均粘连百分比显著更低(21%)(P≤0.005)。轻度腹膜创伤后用手术纱布摩擦腹膜会导致显著更多的粘连形成(58%对23%,P<0.0001)。轻度腹膜创伤后,用手术纱布摩擦产生的粘连明显多于用非手术织物摩擦(63%对19%,P<0.0001)。此外,轻度腹膜创伤后用非手术织物摩擦腹膜并未诱导任何额外的粘连形成(35%对24%,P = 0.23)。

结论

粘连形成的程度与腹膜损伤程度显著相关。标准手术纱布会对腹膜造成创伤并促进粘连形成,而一种磨损性较小的非手术织物则不会。

相似文献

1
Reduction of intraperitoneal adhesion formation by use of non-abrasive gauze.使用非磨砂纱布减少腹腔粘连形成
Br J Surg. 1997 Oct;84(10):1410-5.
2
Short-term effect of surgical trauma on rat peritoneal fibrinolytic activity and its role in adhesion formation.手术创伤对大鼠腹膜纤溶活性的短期影响及其在粘连形成中的作用。
Thromb Haemost. 2000 Nov;84(5):876-81.
3
Endogenous versus exogenous IL-10 in postoperative intraperitoneal adhesion formation in a murine model.小鼠模型中内源性与外源性白细胞介素-10在术后腹腔粘连形成中的作用
J Surg Res. 1997 Jul 1;70(2):138-43. doi: 10.1006/jsre.1997.5124.
4
The extent of adhesion induction through electrocoagulation and suturing in an experimental rat study.电凝和缝合在实验大鼠研究中的粘连诱导程度。
Fertil Steril. 2010 Mar 1;93(4):1040-4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.002. Epub 2009 Jan 14.
5
Prevention of adhesion formations following repair of abdominal wall defects with prosthetic materials (an experimental study).使用人工材料修复腹壁缺损后粘连形成的预防(一项实验研究)
Hepatogastroenterology. 2003 May-Jun;50(51):725-8.
6
Glove powder promotes adhesion formation and facilitates tumour cell adhesion and growth.手套粉末会促进粘连形成,并促进肿瘤细胞的黏附和生长。
Br J Surg. 2001 Sep;88(9):1258-63. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01846.x.
7
A new approach to postoperative peritoneal adhesions: prevention of peritoneal trauma by aloe vera gel.一种新的术后腹膜粘连方法:用芦荟凝胶预防腹膜创伤。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Apr;149(2):195-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.11.019. Epub 2009 Dec 23.
8
The influence of peritoneal closure on formation of intraperitoneal adhesions: an experimental study.
Int J Tissue React. 1986;8(5):355-9.
9
Fibrin sealant (Tissucol) enhances tissue integration of condensed polytetrafluoroethylene meshes and reduces early adhesion formation in experimental intraabdominal peritoneal onlay mesh repair.纤维蛋白密封剂(Tissucol)可增强致密聚四氟乙烯网片的组织整合,并减少实验性腹腔内腹膜覆盖修补术中早期粘连的形成。
J Surg Res. 2008 Dec;150(2):190-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2007.12.796. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
10
Fibrin glue reduces intra-abdominal adhesions to synthetic mesh in a rat ventral hernia model.在大鼠腹疝模型中,纤维蛋白胶可减少腹腔内与合成补片的粘连。
Am Surg. 2000 Jan;66(1):41-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Lap pak for abdominal retraction.用于腹部牵开的拉钩包。
Rev Urol. 2012;14(3-4):41-7.
2
Optimal sutures for use in the abdomen: an evaluation based on the formation of adhesions and abscesses.腹部缝合的最佳缝线选择:基于粘连和脓肿形成的评估。
Surg Today. 2013 Apr;43(4):412-7. doi: 10.1007/s00595-012-0249-y. Epub 2012 Jul 14.
3
Comparison of peritoneal adhesion formation in bowel retraction by cotton towels versus the silicone lap pak device in a rabbit model.兔模型中棉毛巾与硅胶腹腔镜包装置在肠回缩时腹膜粘连形成的比较。
Eplasty. 2011;11:e42. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
4
Experimental study evaluating the effect of a barrier method on postoperative intraabdominal adhesions.评估一种屏障方法对术后腹腔内粘连影响的实验研究。
Dig Dis Sci. 2006 Mar;51(3):566-70. doi: 10.1007/s10620-006-3171-6.
5
Peritoneal adhesions to prosthetic materials: choice of mesh for incisional hernia repair.腹膜与人工合成材料的粘连:切口疝修补术补片的选择
Surg Endosc. 2000 Oct;14(10):960-3. doi: 10.1007/s004640000180.
6
Reduction of peritoneal trauma by using nonsurgical gauze leads to less implantation metastasis of spilled tumor cells.使用非手术纱布减少腹膜创伤可减少溢出肿瘤细胞的种植转移。
Ann Surg. 1998 Feb;227(2):242-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199802000-00014.