Platz E A, Yeole B B, Cho E, Jussawalla D J, Giovannucci E, Ascherio A
Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Int J Epidemiol. 1997 Oct;26(5):933-8. doi: 10.1093/ije/26.5.933.
The role of vasectomy in the development of prostate cancer remains controversial. In particular, there has been concern about detection bias and confounding in the previously published epidemiological studies examining this hypothesis. With the goal of minimizing detection bias, we have evaluated the relation between vasectomy and prostate cancer in a population without routine prostate cancer screening.
A case-control study consisting of 175 prostate cancer cases and 978 controls with cancer diagnoses other than prostate cancer was conducted at hospitals covered by the Bombay Cancer Registry in Bombay, India. History of vasectomy, demographic, and lifestyle factors were obtained by structured interview. Multiple logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Standardizing by age, 8.7% of cases and 8.3% of controls had had a vasectomy. The OR for prostate cancer comparing men who had had a vasectomy to those who did not was 1.48 (95% CI: 0.80-2.72) controlling for age at diagnosis, smoking status, alcohol drinking, and other demographic and lifestyle factors. Risk of prostate cancer associated with vasectomy appeared to be higher among men who underwent vasectomy at least two decades prior to cancer diagnosis or who were at least 40 years old at vasectomy.
Although not statistically significant, the results of this hospital-based case-control study are consistent with the hypothesis of a positive association between vasectomy and prostate cancer. Because routine prostate cancer screening is not common in this population, detection bias was unlikely to account for this association.
输精管切除术在前列腺癌发生中的作用仍存在争议。特别是,在先前发表的检验该假设的流行病学研究中,人们一直担心存在检测偏倚和混杂因素。为了尽量减少检测偏倚,我们在一个没有常规前列腺癌筛查的人群中评估了输精管切除术与前列腺癌之间的关系。
在印度孟买孟买癌症登记处覆盖的医院进行了一项病例对照研究,该研究包括175例前列腺癌病例和978例除前列腺癌外患有其他癌症的对照。通过结构化访谈获取输精管切除术史、人口统计学和生活方式因素。采用多因素logistic回归估计比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。
按年龄标准化后,8.7%的病例和8.3%的对照进行了输精管切除术。在控制诊断时的年龄、吸烟状况、饮酒情况以及其他人口统计学和生活方式因素后,将进行过输精管切除术的男性与未进行过输精管切除术的男性相比,前列腺癌的OR为1.48(95%CI:0.80-2.72)。在癌症诊断前至少二十年进行输精管切除术或输精管切除术时至少40岁的男性中,与输精管切除术相关的前列腺癌风险似乎更高。
尽管在统计学上不显著,但这项基于医院的病例对照研究结果与输精管切除术和前列腺癌之间存在正相关的假设一致。由于该人群中常规前列腺癌筛查并不常见,检测偏倚不太可能解释这种关联。