Hishinuma E S, Fremstad J S
Department of Psychiatry, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 1997 Nov-Dec;30(6):589-98. doi: 10.1177/002221949703000602.
The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has implemented sweeping legislation for all high school students who desire to participate in Division I or II freshman college athletics. Cutoff scores have been set by the NCAA in two areas: grade-point average (GPA) in "core" high school courses, and college-bound tests. High schools must obtain approval from the NCAA Initial-Eligibility Clearinghouse when determining core courses. Unfortunately, minimal attention has been given in the professional learning disability literature to the implications of the NCAA's policies, especially with regard to federal antidiscrimination legislation. Issues are raised regarding (a) the use of test score cutoffs, (b) a minimum GPA for core courses, (c) the responsibility of high schools, and (d) the lack of alternative eligibility procedures for accessing the essential elements of the NCAA's program. Options for consideration are provided in the context of meeting the needs of students with learning disabilities.
美国大学体育协会(NCAA)已针对所有希望参加第一或第二分区大学新生体育赛事的高中生实施了全面的立法。NCAA在两个方面设定了截止分数:高中“核心”课程的平均绩点(GPA)和大学入学考试成绩。高中在确定核心课程时必须获得NCAA初始资格认证中心的批准。不幸的是,专业学习障碍文献中对NCAA政策的影响关注极少,尤其是在联邦反歧视立法方面。提出了以下问题:(a)考试分数截止线的使用,(b)核心课程的最低GPA,(c)高中的责任,以及(d)缺乏获取NCAA项目基本要素的替代资格程序。在满足学习障碍学生需求的背景下提供了可供考虑的选项。