Mitchell P H, Shortell S M
Department of Health Promotion, University of Washington, Seattle 98195-7266, USA.
Med Care. 1997 Nov;35(11 Suppl):NS19-32. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199711001-00003.
This article evaluates the state of the science with respect to morbidity, mortality, and adverse effects as outcomes indicative of variations in organizational variables in care delivery systems.
Eighty-one research papers research examining relations among organizational structures or processes and mortality/adverse effects were reviewed, assembled from electronic and manual searches of the biomedical and health services research literature.
Most research relating mortality and other adverse outcomes to organizational variables has been conducted in acute care hospitals since 1990, with these outcome indicators linked more frequently to organizational structures than to organizational or clinical processes. There is support in some studies, but not in others, that nursing surveillance, quality of working environment, and quality of interaction with other professionals distinguish hospitals with lower mortality and complications from those with higher rates of these adverse effects. Increasing sophistication of risk adjustment methods suggests that variations in mortality and complications are influenced by patient variables more than by organizational variables. Adverse events may be a more sensitive marker of differences in organizational quality in acute care hospitals and long-term care.
Taken together, the acute care studies are not conclusive regarding the extent to which the organizational features of care delivery systems positively influence such bottom-line outcomes as mortality. As severity-adjustment methods become more refined for hospital patients, many of the small differences currently seen in mortality and complications may disappear. However, given that adverse events appear more closely related to organizational factors than in mortality, researchers need to refine and better define such events that are logically related to the coordinative organizational processes among caregivers. Finally, researchers need to go much beyond mortality, morbidity, and adverse events in evaluating the linkage between the organization of care and outcomes.
本文评估了科学现状,涉及发病率、死亡率及不良反应等结果,这些结果可表明医疗服务系统中组织变量的差异。
回顾了81篇研究论文,这些论文研究了组织结构或流程与死亡率/不良反应之间的关系,通过对生物医学和卫生服务研究文献的电子及人工检索收集而来。
自1990年以来,大多数将死亡率和其他不良结果与组织变量相关联的研究是在急性护理医院进行的,这些结果指标与组织结构的关联比与组织或临床流程的关联更为频繁。一些研究支持护理监督、工作环境质量以及与其他专业人员的互动质量能够区分死亡率和并发症较低的医院与这些不良影响发生率较高的医院,但其他研究并不支持。风险调整方法日益复杂,这表明死亡率和并发症的差异受患者变量的影响大于组织变量。不良事件可能是急性护理医院和长期护理中组织质量差异的更敏感指标。
总体而言,急性护理研究对于医疗服务系统的组织特征在多大程度上积极影响死亡率等最终结果尚无定论。随着针对医院患者的严重程度调整方法变得更加精细,目前在死亡率和并发症方面看到的许多细微差异可能会消失。然而,鉴于不良事件似乎比死亡率更与组织因素密切相关,研究人员需要完善并更好地定义与护理人员之间协调组织过程逻辑相关的此类事件。最后,研究人员在评估护理组织与结果之间的联系时,需要远远超越死亡率、发病率和不良事件。