Global Delivery Programs, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation , Seattle, WA, USA.
International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, MD, USA.
Glob Health Action. 2020 Dec 31;13(1):1763078. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1763078.
In low- and middle-income countries, there is scarcity of validated and reliable measurement tools for health facility management, and many interventions to improve primary health care (PHC) facilities are designed without adequate evidence base on what management practices are critical.
This article developed and validated a scorecard to measure management practices at primary health care facilities under the performance-based financing (PBF) scheme in Nigeria.
Relevant management practice domains and indicators for PHC facilities were determined based on literature review and a prior qualitative study conducted in Nigeria. The domains and indicators were tested for face validity via experts review and organized into an interviewer-administered scorecard. A stratified random sampling of PHC facilities in three States in Nigeria was conducted to assess the reliability and construct validity of the scorecard. Inter-rater reliability using inter-class correlation (ICC) (1, k) was assessed with one-way ANOVA. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to assess the construct validity, and an updated factor structure were developed.
32 indicators and 6 management practice domains were initially described. Ordinal responses were derived for each indicator. Data on the scorecard were obtained from 111 PHC facilities. The ICC of mean ratings for each team of judges was 0.94. The EFA identified 6 domains (Stakeholder engagement and communication; Community-level activities; Update of plan and target; Performance management; Staff attention to planning, target, and performance; and Drugs and financial management) and reduced the number of indicators to 17. The average communality of selected items was 0.45, and item per factor ratio was 17:6.
Despite a few areas for further refinement, this paper presents a reliable and valid scorecard for measuring management practices in PHC facilities. The scorecard can be applied for routine supervisory visits to PHC facilities, and can help accumulate knowledge on facility management, how it affects performance, and how it may be strengthened.
在中低收入国家,用于卫生机构管理的经过验证且可靠的衡量工具稀缺,许多旨在改善初级卫生保健(PHC)机构的干预措施都是在缺乏对关键管理实践的充分证据基础上设计的。
本文开发并验证了一个评分卡,用于衡量尼日利亚绩效为基础的融资(PBF)计划下的初级卫生保健机构的管理实践。
根据文献回顾和在尼日利亚进行的一项先前的定性研究,确定了与 PHC 机构相关的管理实践领域和指标。通过专家审查和组织访谈者管理的评分卡,对这些领域和指标进行了表面有效性测试。在尼日利亚三个州进行了 PHC 机构的分层随机抽样,以评估评分卡的可靠性和结构有效性。使用单向方差分析评估组间相关性(ICC)(1,k)的组内相关性。进行探索性因素分析(EFA)以评估结构有效性,并开发更新的因素结构。
最初描述了 32 个指标和 6 个管理实践领域。为每个指标得出了有序反应。从 111 个 PHC 机构获得了评分卡的数据。每个评审小组的平均评分的 ICC 为 0.94。EFA 确定了 6 个领域(利益相关者参与和沟通;社区层面活动;计划和目标更新;绩效管理;员工对规划、目标和绩效的关注;以及药品和财务管理),并将指标数量减少到 17。选择项目的平均共性为 0.45,项目与因素的比例为 17:6。
尽管还有一些需要进一步改进的领域,但本文提出了一种可靠且有效的评分卡,用于衡量 PHC 机构的管理实践。该评分卡可用于对 PHC 机构的常规监督访问,并有助于积累有关设施管理、管理实践如何影响绩效以及如何加强管理实践的知识。