Suppr超能文献

微生物诊断对住院传染病患者抗菌治疗的影响。

The impact of microbiological diagnostics on the antimicrobial treatment of hospitalised patients with infectious disease.

作者信息

Vogel F, Lüth A, Charpentier A

机构信息

Kliniken des Main-Taunus-Kreises, Medizinische Klinik III, Postfach 1240, Hofheim/Taunus D-65702, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Med Res. 1996 Mar 19;1(6):312-4.

PMID:9367945
Abstract

We evaluated a total of 160 treatment protocols from the unit of internal medicine (n = 100) and the intensive care unit (n = 60) of the Bonn University Hospital to detect the influence of microbiological diagnostics on the individual antimicrobial treatment. Ninety-six of hundred patients in regular care were set on empirical antibiotic treatment within 24 to 48 hours after onset of symptoms. In 91% of the cases cure or substantial improvement was achieved via the initial therapy. Microbiological survey revealed multi-resistant pathogens which could be handled using a specific treatment in six of the remaining patients. In contrast, sixty patients in intensive care proved to benefit significantly from microbiological diagnostics. In one quarter of the cases microbiological findings supported the decision on a reasonable escalated therapy, and in another quarter the initial therapeutic schedule could be confirmed. At any rate, about one third of the infections remained bacteriologically inexplicable in spite of excessive microbiological research. Thus, the results of this retrospective evaluation confirm the common practice of an initial antibiotic treatment without bacteriological investigation in less severe and in severe infections. Microbiological screening may help to decide on effective routine antibiosis in patients with less severe infections. We recommend comprehensive individual microbiological diagnostics in patients with severe nosocomial pneumonia or sepsis and in patients at high risk for Candida superinfections. Due to steadily increasing economic pressure, it is necessary to reflect on the expenditure for microbiological diagnostics. The cost-effectiveness-ratio may be optimised mainly in patients with less severe infections and in regular care. The number of microbiological surveys and expenditures in ICU patients appeared adequate as compared to the individual benefit.

摘要

我们评估了波恩大学医院内科(n = 100)和重症监护病房(n = 60)的总共160个治疗方案,以检测微生物诊断对个体抗菌治疗的影响。常规护理的100名患者中有96名在症状出现后24至48小时内开始经验性抗生素治疗。在91%的病例中,通过初始治疗实现了治愈或显著改善。微生物学调查发现了多重耐药病原体,其余6名患者可采用特定治疗方法处理。相比之下,60名重症监护患者被证明从微生物诊断中显著受益。在四分之一的病例中,微生物学检查结果支持合理升级治疗的决定,在另外四分之一的病例中,可以确认初始治疗方案。无论如何,尽管进行了大量微生物学研究,但仍有大约三分之一的感染在细菌学上无法解释。因此,这项回顾性评估的结果证实了在轻度和重度感染中不进行细菌学调查而进行初始抗生素治疗的普遍做法。微生物学筛查可能有助于确定轻度感染患者有效的常规抗菌治疗方案。我们建议对患有严重医院获得性肺炎或败血症的患者以及有念珠菌二重感染高风险的患者进行全面的个体微生物学诊断。由于经济压力不断增加,有必要反思微生物学诊断的费用。成本效益比可能主要在轻度感染患者和常规护理中得到优化。与个体受益相比,重症监护病房患者的微生物学检查数量和费用似乎是合适的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验