Jiménez G, Paroush Z, Ish-Horowicz D
Imperial Cancer Research Fund (ICRF), London WC2A 3PX, England.
Genes Dev. 1997 Nov 15;11(22):3072-82. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.22.3072.
Relatively little is known about the molecular mechanisms involved in transcriptional repression, despite its importance in development and differentiation. Recent evidence suggests that some transcriptional repressors act by way of adaptor molecules known as corepressors. Here, we use in vivo functional assays to test whether different repressor activities are mediated by the Groucho (Gro) corepressor in the Drosophila embryo. Previously, Gro was proposed to mediate repression by the Hairy-related family of basic helix-loop-helix proteins. Our results indicate not only that repression by Hairy requires Gro, but that a repressor domain from the Engrailed (En) homeodomain protein is also Gro dependent. The latter result correlates with an ability of this En domain to bind to Gro in vitro. In contrast, repressor regions from the Even-skipped, Snail, Krüppel, and Knirps transcription factors are effective in the absence of Gro. These results show that Gro is not generally required for repression, but acts as a specific corepressor for a fraction of negative regulators, including Hairy and En.
尽管转录抑制在发育和分化过程中具有重要作用,但目前对其涉及的分子机制了解相对较少。最近的证据表明,一些转录抑制因子通过称为共抑制因子的衔接分子发挥作用。在此,我们利用体内功能分析来测试果蝇胚胎中不同的抑制活性是否由Groucho(Gro)共抑制因子介导。此前,有人提出Gro介导碱性螺旋-环-螺旋蛋白的Hairy相关家族的抑制作用。我们的结果不仅表明Hairy的抑制作用需要Gro,而且来自Engrailed(En)同源域蛋白的一个抑制结构域也依赖于Gro。后一结果与该En结构域在体外结合Gro的能力相关。相比之下,来自Even-skipped、Snail、Krüppel和Knirps转录因子的抑制区域在没有Gro的情况下也有效。这些结果表明,抑制作用一般不需要Gro,但它作为一部分负调节因子(包括Hairy和En)的特异性共抑制因子发挥作用。