Süzer O, Diri E, Konukoğlu D, Ozüner Z
Department of Pharmacology, Istanbul University, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Turkey.
Pharmacol Res. 1997 Jul;36(1):9-15. doi: 10.1006/phrs.1997.0206.
Cardiac transplantation is a prominent development in the treatment of patients with severe cardiac diseases. If it is not possible to transplant the heart immediately after removing it from the donor, procedures for preparing, protecting, storing and transferring of the heart constitute a major portion of this study. Selecting the best method among those used for cardioprotection is still been debated. This experimental study investigated whether isocolloidoosmotic solution in addition to St. Thomas Hospital cardioplegic solution would give better cardioprotection. Wistar rat hearts were isolated and perfused by the Langendorff method (n = 6 for each group). In the control group after stabilisation, the hearts were arrested while perfused with St. Thomas Hospital cardioplegic solution for 3 min, then they were placed in cardioplegic solution at 4 degrees C for 6 h. Afterwards the hearts were reperfused. In the experimental groups, modified gelatin fluid (30 g/l) or HES 200/0.5 (50 g/l) or dextran 70 (25 g/l) was added to the cardioplegic solution. Maximum contractility, +dF/dtmax, -dF/dtmax, heart rate, contractility rate product, coronary flow and lactate dehydrogenase, creatine phosphokinase enzyme leakage were measured in all groups during pre-ischemic and post-ischemic periods (10 min after reperfusion). At the end of each experiment, the hearts were weighted and tissue levels of lipid peroxide, expressed in terms of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, malondialdehyde, glutathione (an important intracellular antioxidant) and ATP were measured. Non-ischemic tissue levels of malondialdehyde, glutathione and ATP were also measured in another group (n = 6). There was no statistically significant difference among the simultaneous experimental and control groups in any criteria evaluated (P > 0.05). The addition of synthetic colloids to the standard cardioplegic solution did not provide further protection except for the gelatin group in which recovered contractile force was not significantly different from the group's initial values. This effect may be explained by its degradation to amino acids which may play a substrate role.
心脏移植是重症心脏病患者治疗领域的一项重大进展。若心脏从供体取出后无法立即进行移植,那么心脏的制备、保护、储存及转运程序便构成了本研究的主要部分。在用于心脏保护的诸多方法中选择最佳方法仍存在争议。本实验研究探讨了除圣托马斯医院心脏停搏液外,等胶体渗透压溶液是否能提供更好的心脏保护作用。采用Langendorff方法分离并灌注Wistar大鼠心脏(每组n = 6)。对照组在稳定后,用圣托马斯医院心脏停搏液灌注使心脏停搏3分钟,然后置于4℃的心脏停搏液中6小时。之后对心脏进行再灌注。在实验组中,向心脏停搏液中添加了改良明胶液(30 g/l)或羟乙基淀粉200/0.5(50 g/l)或右旋糖酐70(25 g/l)。在缺血前期和缺血后期(再灌注后10分钟),测量所有组的最大收缩力、+dF/dtmax、-dF/dtmax、心率、收缩力速率乘积、冠状动脉血流量以及乳酸脱氢酶、肌酸磷酸激酶的酶漏出情况。每次实验结束时,对心脏进行称重,并测量以硫代巴比妥酸反应物质、丙二醛表示的脂质过氧化物组织水平、谷胱甘肽(一种重要的细胞内抗氧化剂)以及ATP。在另一组(n = 6)中还测量了丙二醛、谷胱甘肽和ATP的非缺血组织水平。在评估的任何标准中,同时进行的实验组和对照组之间均无统计学显著差异(P > 0.05)。除明胶组外(其恢复的收缩力与该组初始值无显著差异),向标准心脏停搏液中添加合成胶体并未提供进一步的保护作用。这种效应可能是由于其降解为氨基酸,而氨基酸可能起到底物的作用。