Suppr超能文献

血液透析用颈静脉导管插入术相关并发症:术后X线片的价值

Complications associated with insertion of jugular venous catheters for hemodialysis: the value of postprocedural radiograph.

作者信息

Farrell J, Walshe J, Gellens M, Martin K J

机构信息

National Kidney Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 1997 Nov;30(5):690-2. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(97)90494-7.

Abstract

It is routine in hemodialysis units to require a chest radiograph after the insertion of an internal jugular line for venous access before dialysis is commenced. There are two principal reasons for this: (1) to ensure that no procedural complications have occurred and (2) to verify correct catheter placement. Knowledge of the time delay involved may prompt nephrologists to opt for femoral access (with increased hemodialysis recirculation and need for repeated line placement). The benefit of the postprocedural chest radiograph has never been evaluated in the hemodialysis population. We retrospectively reviewed the data on internal jugular access placement from two large nephrology training centers. Over a 36-month period, 460 internal jugular dialysis catheters were placed in 312 patients. Wherever possible, 15-cm lines were used for the left internal jugular vein and 12-cm lines for the right internal jugular vein. Ultrasound guidance was used in 105 cases (22.8%). There were a total of 90 (19.6%) clinical complications in 62 patients (13.5%). These consisted of carotid artery puncture (n = 35, 7.6%) and hematoma (n = 55, 12%). All of these patients had a normal post-internal jugular chest radiograph. Carotid artery puncture did not occur if ultrasound guidance was used. There was no case of associated pneumothorax. Of the 370 line insertions in 250 patients in whom it was believed clinically that no complication had occurred, the chest radiograph only showed unsuspected line malposition in four cases (1.08%). Routine chest radiographs rarely contribute to the diagnosis of any procedural complications and are of little value after internal jugular access placement, especially if it is believed clinically that no complication occurred.

摘要

在血液透析单元,在开始透析前插入颈内静脉导管建立静脉通路后常规需要进行胸部X线检查。这样做主要有两个原因:(1)确保未发生操作并发症;(2)确认导管位置正确。了解其中涉及的时间延迟可能会促使肾病学家选择股静脉通路(这会增加血液透析再循环并需要反复置管)。术后胸部X线检查的益处从未在血液透析人群中得到评估。我们回顾性分析了来自两个大型肾病培训中心的颈内静脉置管数据。在36个月期间,312例患者共置入了460根颈内静脉透析导管。尽可能使用15厘米长的导管用于左颈内静脉,12厘米长的导管用于右颈内静脉。105例(22.8%)使用了超声引导。62例患者(13.5%)共有90例(19.6%)临床并发症。这些并发症包括颈动脉穿刺(n = 35,7.6%)和血肿(n = 55,12%)。所有这些患者颈内静脉置管后的胸部X线检查均正常。如果使用超声引导则未发生颈动脉穿刺。没有出现相关气胸病例。在临床认为未发生并发症的250例患者的370次置管中,胸部X线检查仅在4例(1.08%)中显示出意外的导管位置异常。常规胸部X线检查很少有助于诊断任何操作并发症,在颈内静脉置管后价值不大,特别是如果临床认为未发生并发症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验