Odenholt I, Löwdin E, Cars O
Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997 Nov;41(11):2522-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.41.11.2522.
Most antibiotics are known to be incapable of killing nongrowing or slowly growing bacteria with few exceptions. Bacterial cell division is inhibited during the postantibiotic phase (PA phase) after short exposure to antibiotics. Only scarce and conflicting data are available concerning the ability of antibiotics to kill bacteria in the PA phase. The aim of the present study was to investigate the killing effect of four different antibiotics on bacteria in the PA phase. A postantibiotic effect (PAE) was induced by exposing Streptococcus pyogenes and Haemophilus influenzae to 10x MICs of benzylpenicillin, cefuroxime, sparfloxacin, and azithromycin. The bacteria were thereafter reexposed to a 10x MIC of the same antibiotic used for the induction of the PAE at the beginning of and after 2 and 4 h in the PA phase. Due to a very long PAE, the bacteria in PA phase induced by azithromycin were also exposed to 10x MICs after 6 and 8 h. A previously unexposed culture exposed to a 10x MIC was used as a control. The results seem to be dependent on both the antibiotic used and the bacterial species. The antibiotics exhibiting a fork bactericidal action gave significantly reduced killing of the bacteria in PA phase (cefuroxime with S. pyogenes, P < 0.01, and sparfloxacin with H. influenzae, P < 0.001), which was restored at 4 h for cefuroxime with S. pyogenes. There was a tendency to restoration of the bactericidal activity also with sparfloxacin and H. influenzae, but there was still a significant difference in killing between the control and the test bacteria in PA phase at 4 h. However, in the combinations with a lesser bactericidal effect (benzylpenicillin with S. pyogenes and sparfloxacin with S. pyogenes), there was no difference in killing between the control and the test bacteria in PA phase. Azithromycin induced long PAEs in both S. pyogenes and H. influenzae and exhibited a slower bactericidal action on both the control and the bacteria in PA phase especially at the end of the PAE, when the killing was almost bacteriostatic. Our findings in this study support the concept that a long interval (> 12 h) between doses of azithromycin, restoring full bactericidal action, may be beneficial to optimize efficacy of this drug but is not necessary for the other antibiotics evaluated, since the bactericidal effect seems to be restored already at 4 h.
众所周知,大多数抗生素无法杀死不生长或生长缓慢的细菌,仅有少数例外情况。在短时间接触抗生素后的抗生素后效应期(PA期),细菌细胞分裂会受到抑制。关于抗生素在PA期杀死细菌的能力,仅有稀少且相互矛盾的数据。本研究的目的是调查四种不同抗生素对PA期细菌的杀伤作用。通过将化脓性链球菌和流感嗜血杆菌暴露于10倍MIC的苄青霉素、头孢呋辛、司帕沙星和阿奇霉素来诱导抗生素后效应(PAE)。此后,在PA期开始时以及2小时和4小时后,将细菌重新暴露于用于诱导PAE的相同抗生素的10倍MIC。由于PAE非常长,阿奇霉素诱导的PA期细菌在6小时和8小时后也暴露于10倍MIC。将未预先暴露的培养物暴露于10倍MIC用作对照。结果似乎既取决于所用的抗生素,也取决于细菌种类。表现出分叉杀菌作用的抗生素在PA期对细菌的杀伤作用显著降低(头孢呋辛与化脓性链球菌,P<0.01;司帕沙星与流感嗜血杆菌,P<0.001),头孢呋辛与化脓性链球菌在4小时时恢复。司帕沙星与流感嗜血杆菌也有杀菌活性恢复的趋势,但在4小时时,PA期对照菌与受试菌之间的杀伤仍存在显著差异。然而,在杀菌作用较小的组合中(苄青霉素与化脓性链球菌以及司帕沙星与化脓性链球菌),PA期对照菌与受试菌之间的杀伤没有差异。阿奇霉素在化脓性链球菌和流感嗜血杆菌中均诱导出较长的PAE,并且在PA期对对照菌和细菌均表现出较慢的杀菌作用,尤其是在PAE末期,此时杀伤几乎是抑菌性的。我们在本研究中的发现支持这样一种观点,即阿奇霉素给药间隔较长(>12小时)可恢复完全杀菌作用,这可能有利于优化该药物的疗效,但对于评估的其他抗生素则没有必要,因为杀菌作用似乎在4小时时就已恢复。