Suppr超能文献

使用B-VAT II显示器比较用艾伦视力表和斯内伦视力字母表测量的视力。

Comparison of visual acuity measured with Allen figures and Snellen letters using the B-VAT II monitor.

作者信息

Lueder G T, Garibaldi D

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 1997 Nov;104(11):1758-61. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30030-x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Allen figure optotypes commonly are used to measure visual acuity in young children. Children with normal acuity measured with Allen figures sometimes are found to have unsuspected amblyopia that is detected when they are tested with Snellen letters. The correlation between visual acuities measured with these two optotype charts has not been well studied. The authors compared visual acuities measured with Allen figure and Snellen letter optotypes using the Mentor B-VAT II monitor.

DESIGN

The study design was a nonrandomized, comparative clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

The study was composed of 12 adult subjects.

INTERVENTION

Visual acuities were measured using both Allen figure and Snellen letter optotypes using the B-VAT II monitor. The images were progressively blurred using plus lenses.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual acuity was measured.

RESULTS

At visual acuity levels of 20/60 or better, Allen figure testing averaged 1.5 lines better than Snellen letter testing; between 20/70 and 20/200 visual acuities, the difference was 2.5 lines.

CONCLUSIONS

Allen figure testing with the B-VAT II monitor overestimates visual acuity compared with testing with Snellen letters. This appears to result primarily from the construction of the optotypes. This discrepancy should be considered when visual acuity is measured in young children.

摘要

目的

艾伦图形视标常用于测量幼儿的视力。用艾伦图形测得视力正常的儿童,有时在用斯内伦字母表检测时会被发现有未被察觉的弱视。这两种视标图表所测视力之间的相关性尚未得到充分研究。作者使用Mentor B-VAT II显示器比较了用艾伦图形视标和斯内伦字母视标测得的视力。

设计

研究设计为非随机对照临床试验。

参与者

该研究由12名成年受试者组成。

干预措施

使用B-VAT II显示器,分别用艾伦图形视标和斯内伦字母视标测量视力。通过增加镜片使图像逐渐模糊。

主要观察指标

测量视力。

结果

在视力水平为20/60或更好时,艾伦图形测试平均比斯内伦字母测试好1.5行;在20/70至20/200的视力之间,差异为2.5行。

结论

与用斯内伦字母测试相比,使用B-VAT II显示器进行艾伦图形测试会高估视力。这似乎主要是由视标的构造导致的。在测量幼儿视力时应考虑这种差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验