Suppr超能文献

采用酶免疫分析(EIA)和免疫荧光(IF)技术检测核抗原自身抗体。

Detection of autoantibodies to nuclear antigens by EIA and IF techniques.

作者信息

Alem M, Moghadam S, Malki J, Zaidi A, Nayak N, Li T M

机构信息

Hycor Biomedical Inc., Garden Grove, CA 92841, USA.

出版信息

Allerg Immunol (Paris). 1997 Sep;29(7):188, 191-4.

PMID:9373708
Abstract

The detection of antibodies to certain nuclear components has considerable importance in the diagnosis and management of patients with autoimmune diseases. In this study, antibodies to nuclear antigens in 250 positive and negative patient specimens were detected by immunofluorescence (IF) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Specimens were tested by three different EIA assays for autoantibodies to SS-A, SS-B, Scl-70 Sm, RNP, Jo-1, ENA, Histone, ss-DNA and ds-DNA and one IF assay for Antinuclear Antibodies (ANA). The majority of positive specimens were also confirmed positive by Western Blot. Ninety-seven percent of IF-ANA positive specimens assayed positive by EIA-ENA assay and only 6% of ENA negative specimens tested positive in IF-ANA assay indicating that EIA-ENA assay is as reliable as IF-ANA for screening patient specimens. Forty-five percent of EIA Jo-1 positive specimens showed negative IF-ANA results indicating that IF-ANA assay is not a reliable method for detection of antibodies to Jo-1. This may be due to the fact that specimens with low titer and sera which are positive for a limited number of specific nuclear antigen(s) cannot produce visible or clear fluorescence patterns and therefore are reported negative by IF-ANA. Our data shows that both methods are reliable for screening purposes, however EIA has greater specificity over IF because the presence or absence of antibody to a specific antigen can be better assessed. Overall, due to higher reproducibility, low cost, antigen specificity, and the nature of EIA, we recommend microtiter-based EIA assays for detection of antibodies to nuclear antigens.

摘要

检测针对某些核成分的抗体在自身免疫性疾病患者的诊断和管理中具有相当重要的意义。在本研究中,通过免疫荧光法(IF)和酶免疫分析法(EIA)检测了250份阳性和阴性患者标本中的核抗原抗体。标本通过三种不同的EIA检测方法检测抗SS - A、SS - B、Scl - 70、Sm、RNP、Jo - 1、ENA、组蛋白、单链DNA和双链DNA的自身抗体,以及一种IF检测方法检测抗核抗体(ANA)。大多数阳性标本也通过蛋白质印迹法确认为阳性。97%的IF - ANA阳性标本在EIA - ENA检测中呈阳性,而仅6%的ENA阴性标本在IF - ANA检测中呈阳性,这表明EIA - ENA检测在筛查患者标本方面与IF - ANA一样可靠。45%的EIA Jo - 1阳性标本显示IF - ANA结果为阴性,这表明IF - ANA检测不是检测抗Jo - 1抗体的可靠方法。这可能是由于滴度低的标本以及对有限数量的特定核抗原呈阳性的血清不能产生可见或清晰的荧光模式,因此IF - ANA报告为阴性。我们的数据表明,两种方法在筛查目的上都是可靠的,然而EIA比IF具有更高的特异性,因为可以更好地评估针对特定抗原的抗体的存在与否。总体而言,由于EIA具有更高的可重复性、低成本、抗原特异性以及其性质,我们推荐基于微量滴定板的EIA检测方法用于检测核抗原抗体。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验