Sjöwall Christopher, Sturm Martin, Dahle Charlotte, Bengtsson Anders A, Jönsen Andreas, Sturfelt Gunnar, Skogh Thomas
Division of Rheumatology, Autoimmunity and Immune Regulation unit (AIR) and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, Linköping University, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
J Rheumatol. 2008 Oct;35(10):1994-2000. Epub 2008 Sep 1.
To evaluate antinuclear antibody (ANA) tests in established cases of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy (F-ANA) and enzyme-immunoassays detecting antinucleosomal antibodies (ANSA-EIA).
Sera from 50 patients with SLE and 65 patients with RA were analyzed regarding abnormal concentrations of F-ANA (serum dilution>or=1:200=95th percentile among 300 healthy blood donors). The sera were also analyzed with 2 commercial ANSA-EIA kits.
An abnormal F-ANA titer occurred in 76% of the SLE sera compared to 23% in RA, and was not related to present use of antirheumatic drugs. At dilution 1:50, 84% of the SLE sera were F-ANA-positive compared to 20% of healthy women. Forty percent and 56%, respectively, of the SLE sera tested positive in the 2 ANSA-EIA kits. By the most sensitive assay, 96% of the ANSA-positive SLE sera produced a homogenous (chromosomal) F-ANA staining pattern compared to 18% of the ANSA-negative SLE sera. Ten of the 15 F-ANA-positive RA sera (63%) generated homogenous F-ANA staining and 13 (20%) tested positive in the most sensitive ANSA-EIA, but with no correlation to the F-ANA staining pattern.
The sensitivity of F-ANA at an abnormal titer was surprisingly low (76%) in established cases of SLE. ANSA occurred in 56% of the SLE sera, but also in a fair number (20%) of RA sera. Practically all ANSA-positive SLE sera were identified by chromosomal F-ANA staining. We conclude that the antigen-specific antinucleosomal EIA does not have high enough diagnostic specificity to justify use of this analysis for routine diagnostic purposes.
通过间接免疫荧光显微镜检查(F-ANA)和检测抗核小体抗体的酶免疫分析(ANSA-EIA),评估系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)和类风湿关节炎(RA)确诊病例中的抗核抗体(ANA)检测。
分析50例SLE患者和65例RA患者血清中F-ANA的异常浓度(血清稀释度≥1:200 = 300名健康献血者中的第95百分位数)。这些血清还用2种商用ANSA-EIA试剂盒进行分析。
SLE血清中76%出现F-ANA滴度异常,而RA中为23%,且与目前使用抗风湿药物无关。在1:50稀释度时,84%的SLE血清F-ANA呈阳性,而健康女性为20%。两种ANSA-EIA试剂盒检测的SLE血清分别有40%和56%呈阳性。在最敏感的检测方法中,96%的ANSA阳性SLE血清产生均匀(染色体)F-ANA染色模式,而ANSA阴性SLE血清为18%。15份F-ANA阳性RA血清中有10份(63%)产生均匀F-ANA染色,13份(20%)在最敏感的ANSA-EIA中呈阳性,但与F-ANA染色模式无关。
在SLE确诊病例中,F-ANA异常滴度的敏感性出奇地低(76%)。56% 的SLE血清中出现ANSA,但也有相当数量(20%) 的RA血清中出现。几乎所有ANSA阳性SLE血清都通过染色体F-ANA染色鉴定。我们得出结论,抗原特异性抗核小体EIA的诊断特异性不够高,不足以证明该分析用于常规诊断目的的合理性。