Cordeiro P G, Schwartz M, Neves R I, Tuma R
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Ann Plast Surg. 1997 Nov;39(5):461-8. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199711000-00004.
In patients who undergo oral cavity reconstruction, loss of sensation plays a vital role in producing disturbances in postoperative oral function. Microsurgical techniques have provided a method of addressing this deficit through the use of sensate cutaneous free flaps in which microneural anastomoses are performed between a sensory nerve supplying the flap, and a recipient nerve in the head and neck. The purpose of this study was to compare the cutaneous sensation of the radial forearm flap and lateral arm flap donor sites, the two most commonly used intraoral sensate flaps. For comparison, sensation was also determined in five intraoral sites: the tip of tongue, lateral tongue, cheek, gingiva, and hard palate. Sensation was evaluated at the two potential donor sites in 66 random subjects using static and moving two-point discrimination, thermal sensation differences, and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament pressures. In the same subjects Semmes-Weinstein monofilament pressures were used to evaluate intraoral sensation. Information was recorded on age, sex, smoking and denture status. All four sensory evaluations demonstrated that the lateral arm flap donor site was more sensitive than the radial forearm donor site. Thermal sensitivity differentials (0.52 vs. 0.40 degrees C, p < 0.001), static two-point discrimination (15.4 vs. 15.0 mm, p < 0.2), moving two-point discrimination (5.8 vs. 4.8 mm, p < 0.03), and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament pressures (5.10 vs. 4.08 g per square millimeter, p < 0.001) all indicated a more sensitive lateral arm flap donor site. Older subjects had significantly decreased sensation at both donor sites based on static two-point discrimination and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing. No sex differences were noted. Based on Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing in the mouth, the tip of the tongue is the most sensitive area (2.26 g per square millimeter), followed by the hard palate (3.60 g per square millimeter), the lateral tongue (4.08 g per square millimeter), the cheek (4.77 g per square millimeter), and the gingiva (8.06 g per square millimeter). Smokers had significantly decreased sensation at the tip of tongue and hard palate. Denture wearers had significantly diminished sensation in all intraoral locations except the lateral tongue. Older patients had significantly diminished sensation at all intraoral sites. No sex differences were noted. The lateral arm flap donor site is a more sensitive region than the radial forearm flap donor site. However, the lateral arm flap donor site is less sensitive than the tip of tongue and hard palate, while the radial forearm flap donor site is less sensitive than the tip of tongue, hard palate, lateral tongue, and cheek. This suggests that for certain locations, intraoral sensate flaps may require measures such as sensory reeducation protocols to approach normal recipient site sensation.
在接受口腔重建的患者中,感觉丧失在术后口腔功能紊乱的产生中起着至关重要的作用。显微外科技术通过使用带感觉的游离皮瓣提供了一种解决这一缺陷的方法,即在供应皮瓣的感觉神经与头颈部的受区神经之间进行显微神经吻合。本研究的目的是比较桡侧前臂皮瓣和上臂外侧皮瓣供区的皮肤感觉,这是两种最常用的口腔内带感觉皮瓣。为作比较,还测定了五个口腔内部位的感觉:舌尖、舌侧、颊部、牙龈和硬腭。使用静态和动态两点辨别觉、温度感觉差异和Semmes-Weinstein单丝压力,对66名随机受试者的两个潜在供区的感觉进行了评估。在同一受试者中,使用Semmes-Weinstein单丝压力评估口腔内感觉。记录了年龄、性别、吸烟和戴假牙情况等信息。所有四项感觉评估均表明,上臂外侧皮瓣供区比桡侧前臂供区更敏感。温度敏感性差异(0.52对0.40℃,p<0.001)、静态两点辨别觉(15.4对15.0mm,p<0.2)、动态两点辨别觉(5.8对4.8mm,p<0.03)以及Semmes-Weinstein单丝压力(5.10对4.08g每平方毫米,p<0.001)均表明上臂外侧皮瓣供区更敏感。根据静态两点辨别觉和Semmes-Weinstein单丝测试,老年受试者在两个供区的感觉均显著降低。未发现性别差异。根据口腔内的Semmes-Weinstein单丝测试,舌尖是最敏感的区域(2.26g每平方毫米),其次是硬腭(3.60g每平方毫米)、舌侧(4.08g每平方毫米)、颊部(4.77g每平方毫米)和牙龈(8.06g每平方毫米)。吸烟者在舌尖和硬腭的感觉显著降低。戴假牙者在除舌侧外的所有口腔内部位感觉均显著减退。老年患者在所有口腔内部位的感觉均显著减退。未发现性别差异。上臂外侧皮瓣供区比桡侧前臂皮瓣供区更敏感。然而,上臂外侧皮瓣供区比舌尖和硬腭不敏感,而桡侧前臂皮瓣供区比舌尖、硬腭、舌侧和颊部不敏感。这表明对于某些部位,口腔内带感觉皮瓣可能需要采取诸如感觉再训练方案等措施来接近正常受区部位的感觉。