Stewart M
Department of Physiology, State University of New York Health Science Center, Brooklyn 11203, USA.
Brain Res. 1997 Sep 19;769(1):71-85. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(97)00690-2.
The subiculum forms part of the region of transition between hippocampus and entorhinal cortex and is one of the primary output structures of the hippocampal formation. Intracellular recordings from subicular bursting and non-bursting cell types and field potential recordings were taken in horizontal slices from rat brains. The inputs and outputs of the two cell types were studied for the purpose of reinforcing or refuting the dichotomy proposed on the basis of membrane properties. Some bursting cells were antidromically activated by stimuli applied to the superficial or deep layers of presubiculum, but never by stimuli applied to deep layers of medial entorhinal cortex (dMEC). Some non-bursting subicular neurons were antidromically activated by stimuli applied to dMEC, but never by stimuli applied to presubiculum. Antidromic population events in subiculum were single spikes when deep MEC was stimulated, but were bursts when presubiculum was stimulated, even in the presence of glutamate receptor antagonists. Population bursts consist of 2 or more population spikes with peak to peak intervals of approximately 5 ms. That population bursts occur in slices where excitatory transmission is blocked suggests that such population bursts reflect coincident bursts by individual neurons. Short-latency (< 5 ms) excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) were evoked in both subicular cell types in response to single entorhinal, presubicular and CA1 stimuli. Long-latency (> 10 ms) EPSPs were seen in both cell types in response to presubicular, but not entorhinal or CA1 stimulation. Bursting cells responded to brief trains of orthodromic stimuli (2-10 pulses, 5-10 ms interstimulus interval) with a burst of action potentials even when the cell was previously depolarized out of bursting range by current injection. Non-bursting cells responded to brief trains of orthodromic stimuli with repetitive firing (< or = 1 spike/stimulus) at all holding potentials. Spike intervals could reach those seen in bursts by bursting cells. It is concluded that: (1) the distinction between bursting and non-bursting subicular neurons is a dichotomy and cells do not change their identity when activated antidromically or orthodromically; (2) the outputs of the two cell types may be different: bursting cells projected to presubiculum and non-bursting cells projected to entorhinal cortex; and (3) non-bursting cells can, when repetitively stimulated, fire repetitive spikes with interspike intervals in the range of intervals seen in bursts.
海马下脚构成海马体和内嗅皮质之间过渡区域的一部分,是海马结构的主要输出结构之一。从大鼠脑水平切片中获取海马下脚爆发性和非爆发性细胞类型的细胞内记录以及场电位记录。为了支持或反驳基于膜特性提出的二分法,对这两种细胞类型的输入和输出进行了研究。一些爆发性细胞可被施加于前海马浅层或深层的刺激逆向激活,但从未被施加于内侧内嗅皮质深层(dMEC)的刺激逆向激活。一些非爆发性海马下脚神经元可被施加于dMEC的刺激逆向激活,但从未被施加于前海马的刺激逆向激活。当刺激深层MEC时,海马下脚的逆向群体事件为单个锋电位,但当刺激前海马时,即使存在谷氨酸受体拮抗剂,也是爆发,群体爆发由2个或更多群体锋电位组成,峰峰间隔约为5毫秒。在兴奋性传递被阻断的切片中出现群体爆发,这表明这种群体爆发反映了单个神经元的同步爆发。在两种海马下脚细胞类型中,对单个内嗅、前海马和CA1刺激均诱发了短潜伏期(<5毫秒)兴奋性突触后电位(EPSP)。在两种细胞类型中,对前海马刺激均可见到长潜伏期(>10毫秒)EPSP,但对内嗅或CA1刺激则未见。即使细胞先前因电流注入而被去极化至爆发范围之外,爆发性细胞对短暂的顺向刺激串(2 - 10个脉冲,刺激间隔5 - 10毫秒)仍会产生一串动作电位。非爆发性细胞在所有钳制电位下对短暂的顺向刺激串均以重复放电(<或 = 1个锋电位/刺激)做出反应。锋电位间隔可达到爆发性细胞爆发时的间隔。得出以下结论:(1)海马下脚爆发性和非爆发性神经元之间的区别是一种二分法,细胞在被逆向或顺向激活时不会改变其特性;(2)两种细胞类型的输出可能不同:爆发性细胞投射到前海马,非爆发性细胞投射到内嗅皮质;(3)非爆发性细胞在受到重复刺激时,可产生重复锋电位,其锋电位间隔在爆发时所见的间隔范围内。