Muijs R D
Department of Communication Science, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium.
Br J Educ Psychol. 1997 Sep;67 ( Pt 3):263-77; discussion 339-43. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01243.x.
A large body of research supports the existence of an academic achievement--self-concept relationship. Path analyses mostly show academic achievement to be causally predominant in this relationship.
This study aims to replicate these findings among Belgian primary school-age children, controlling for a number of other relevant variables such as school commitment, parental socio-economic status (SES), gender and teacher expectations. The longitudinal design of this study makes it particularly suited for this purpose.
Data were analysed using correlation, regressions of time 1 independent variables on time 2 dependent variables, multiple classification analysis and path analysis using LISREL.
Academic self-concept and academic achievement were found to be strong predictors of one another, even controlling for other variables and stability of both over time. The only other variable to enter significantly into regressions on time 2 academic achievement and academic self-concept was parental socio-economic status (SES). Both the regression analyses and path analysis undertaken specifically to test causal predominance found achievement to be causally predominant in this sample.
The fact that academic achievement was causally predominant over academic self-concept, that global self-esteem was not a significant predictor of achievement, and the significant contribution of parental SES to achievement all suggest that self-esteem enhancement in itself cannot be a solution to the problem of academic failure.
大量研究支持学业成就与自我概念之间关系的存在。路径分析大多表明在这种关系中,学业成就在因果关系上占主导地位。
本研究旨在验证比利时小学阶段儿童中是否存在这些研究结果,同时控制一些其他相关变量,如学业投入、父母社会经济地位(SES)、性别和教师期望。本研究的纵向设计使其特别适合这一目的。
使用相关性分析、将时间1的自变量对时间2的因变量进行回归分析、多重分类分析以及使用LISREL进行路径分析来分析数据。
研究发现学业自我概念和学业成就相互之间都是强有力的预测因素,即便控制了其他变量以及二者随时间的稳定性。在对时间2的学业成就和学业自我概念进行回归分析时,唯一另一个能显著进入回归方程的变量是父母社会经济地位(SES)。专门用于检验因果主导性的回归分析和路径分析均发现,在这个样本中成就具有因果主导性。
学业成就比学业自我概念在因果关系上占主导地位、总体自尊不是成就的显著预测因素以及父母SES对成就有显著贡献,所有这些事实均表明,自尊提升本身并不能解决学业失败的问题。