Ellinger K, Luiz T, Obenauer P
Institut für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Fakultät für Klinische Medizin Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg.
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1997 Aug;32(8):488-95. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995097.
Recently, documentation systems based on portable personal computers have become available for application in prehospital emergency medicine. The aim of the present study was to compare a handwritten record system with a pen-computing assisted documentation system.
52 consecutive jobs of the local mobile intensive care unit (MICU) were recorded both by means of a handwritten record and by use of a pen-computer-assisted documentation system (NAPROT, based on DIVI-documentation system version 2.5). The paramedic performing pen-computing was obliged to restrict data inputs to those moments during which emergency physician was able to fill in his record. NAPROT routinely checked the records derived from the pen-computer for completeness of data before print-out.
Neither hardware nor software problems occurred. Compared to the handwritten records the electronic documentation system resulted in a significant increase in recorded data. The following parameters were recorded more frequently by means of the new method of documentation: Glasgow Coma Score (47 vs 36 patients), positioning manoeuvres (36 vs 19 patients), blood glucose level (25 vs 17 patients), and complications (13 vs. 4 events).
Pen-computing assisted documentation resulted in superior quality of data recorded in emergency medical files. This increase in information may be ascribed to the integrated check for completeness of data. The described new documentation system, therefore, enhances the processing quality in prehospital emergency medicine. Further developments of the documentation system should concentrate on tools while reducing the workload of the emergency physician.
近来,基于便携式个人电脑的记录系统已可应用于院前急救医学。本研究的目的是比较手写记录系统和笔式计算机辅助记录系统。
当地移动重症监护单元(MICU)连续52次任务分别通过手写记录和使用笔式计算机辅助记录系统(NAPROT,基于DIVI记录系统2.5版)进行记录。进行笔式计算机记录的护理人员必须将数据输入限制在急诊医生能够填写其记录的时间段内。NAPROT在打印前会常规检查笔式计算机生成的记录的数据完整性。
未出现硬件或软件问题。与手写记录相比,电子记录系统记录的数据显著增加。采用新的记录方法更频繁记录的参数如下:格拉斯哥昏迷评分(47例对36例患者)、体位调整(36例对19例患者)、血糖水平(25例对17例患者)以及并发症(13例对4例事件)。
笔式计算机辅助记录使急诊医疗文件中记录的数据质量更高。信息的增加可能归因于数据完整性的综合检查。因此,所描述的新记录系统提高了院前急救医学的处理质量。记录系统的进一步发展应专注于工具,同时减轻急诊医生的工作量。