Ruiz Pérez R, Delgado López-Cozar E, Jiménez Contreras E
Facultad de Biblioteconomía y Documentación, Universidad de Granada.
An Med Interna. 1997 Aug;14(8):384-93.
The evaluation of scientific journal has become a necessary exercise for a variety of purposes and parties. We evaluated compliance with ISO standards for periodicals by the Spanish biomedical journal An. Med. Interna. Compliance with 136 data items based on different standards was evaluated with the help of a specially developed data sheet, and expressed as overall mean compliance (49.2%) and actual mean compliance (83.4%), i.e., compliance with those items considered necessary for the effective transfer of information via data bases. Items for which standardization was not optimal were examined in detail and specific recommendations for correction were given. We conclude that An. Med. Interna effectively fulfills its mission as an instrument for the communication of research results. In comparison with Spanish journals covering different areas and published by different organizations, compliance with international standards was better in An. Med. Interna.
出于各种目的和涉及多方，对科学期刊进行评估已成为一项必要工作。我们评估了西班牙生物医学期刊《内科医学年鉴》（An. Med. Interna）对国际标准化组织（ISO）期刊标准的遵循情况。借助专门设计的数据表，对基于不同标准的136个数据项的遵循情况进行了评估，并表示为总体平均遵循率（49.2%）和实际平均遵循率（83.4%），即对那些被认为通过数据库有效传递信息所必需的项目的遵循率。对标准化并非最佳的项目进行了详细审查，并给出了具体的修正建议。我们得出结论，《内科医学年鉴》有效地履行了其作为研究成果交流工具的使命。与西班牙不同组织出版的涵盖不同领域的期刊相比，《内科医学年鉴》对国际标准的遵循情况更好。
