Suppr超能文献

痉挛性斜颈患者的空间定向感知。第2部分:视觉垂直线。

Perception of spatial orientation in spasmodic torticollis. Part 2: The visual vertical.

作者信息

Anastasopoulos D, Bhatia K, Bronstein A M, Marsden C D, Gresty M A

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Ioannina Medical School, Greece.

出版信息

Mov Disord. 1997 Sep;12(5):709-14. doi: 10.1002/mds.870120514.

Abstract

Twenty-nine patients with idiopathic spasmodic torticollis (ST) and matched normal control subjects were asked to align a target line to perceived earth vertical [visual vertical (VV)]. Settings were made against a whole-field random-dot background that was either stationary or rotating around the line of sight, and subjects performed the task upright and lying horizontally on their sides. Normal subjects were tested both head upright and after assuming a voluntary head tilt. Patients with ST set the VV close to true upright with a minimal deviation toward tilt of the head in contrast to normal subjects assuming a head tilt who set the VV in the opposite direction to the head tilt (Müller "E" effect). Settings against the spinning disk were biased in the direction of rotation similarly for both subject groups. Settings made against static or spinning disk performed when subjects lay horizontally were tilted in the direction of recumbence (Aubert "A" effect) similarly for both subject groups. When attempting to set the target line parallel to the long axis of the face, patients with head tilt set the line to upright, whereas normal subjects correctly estimated their tilts. One hypothesis offered to explain these results is that the patients referenced only their upright trunk for vertical and did not make use of neck proprioceptive or vestibular signals of head tilt so that all settings were made as if the trunk and head were upright. Alternatively, patients may have used only otolith signals as the reference for upright, and these are recalibrated in ST patients with head tilt. The pathological deviation becomes accepted as upright posture, and VVs and facial orientation are estimated as if the head were upright. In either case the findings indicate abnormal processing of the perception of visual verticality in ST patients.

摘要

29例特发性痉挛性斜颈(ST)患者和相匹配的正常对照者被要求将一条目标线与所感知的地球垂直方向[视觉垂直(VV)]对齐。在静止或绕视线旋转的全场随机点背景下进行设置,受试者分别在直立位和侧卧位水平躺着时完成任务。正常受试者在头部直立时以及主动使头部倾斜后均接受测试。与主动使头部倾斜的正常受试者将VV设置为与头部倾斜方向相反(米勒“E”效应)不同,ST患者将VV设置得接近真正的直立位,且向头部倾斜方向的偏差最小。对于两个受试组,在旋转圆盘背景下的设置都同样偏向旋转方向。两个受试组在水平躺着时针对静态或旋转圆盘所做的设置都同样向卧位方向倾斜(奥伯特“A”效应)。当试图将目标线设置为与面部长轴平行时,头部倾斜的患者将线设置为直立,而正常受试者能正确估计自己的倾斜度。为解释这些结果提出的一个假设是,患者仅以其直立的躯干作为垂直方向的参照,未利用颈部本体感觉或头部倾斜的前庭信号,因此所有设置都如同躯干和头部是直立的一样。或者,患者可能仅将耳石信号用作直立的参照,而在头部倾斜的ST患者中这些信号会重新校准。病理性偏差被当作直立姿势接受,并且VV和面部朝向的估计就好像头部是直立的一样。无论哪种情况,这些发现都表明ST患者在视觉垂直感知方面存在异常处理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验