• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Thrombolytic therapy versus primary angioplasty. Which offers the best outcome after myocardial infarction?

作者信息

Faxon D P

机构信息

University of Southern California School of Medicine 90033, USA.

出版信息

Postgrad Med. 1997 Nov;102(5):97-8, 103-4, 107-8 passim. doi: 10.3810/pgm.1997.11.356.

DOI:10.3810/pgm.1997.11.356
PMID:9385334
Abstract

The best technique for reestablishing blood flow after myocardial infarction has been the subject of heated debate for more than a decade. An the answer is still elusive. Which option is the safest? Which salvages the most heart tissue? Dr Faxon explains the pros and cons of both thrombolysis and angioplasty and discusses the "90 rule," which helps determine the optimal reperfusion strategy for each individual patient.

摘要

相似文献

1
Thrombolytic therapy versus primary angioplasty. Which offers the best outcome after myocardial infarction?
Postgrad Med. 1997 Nov;102(5):97-8, 103-4, 107-8 passim. doi: 10.3810/pgm.1997.11.356.
2
Diagnosis and management of failed thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction.
Indian Heart J. 2010 Jan-Feb;62(1):21-8.
3
Viewpoint: thrombolysis or angioplasty in the real world: a UK perspective.
Circulation. 2006 Jun 13;113(23):f89-91.
4
Effectiveness and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention after fibrinolytic therapy for ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction.溶栓治疗急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的有效性和安全性。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Apr 1;107(7):1001-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.11.024. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
5
Contemporary mortality differences between primary percutaneous coronary intervention and thrombolysis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,当代直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与溶栓治疗的死亡率差异
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Mar 28;171(6):544-9. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.57.
6
A comparison of thrombolytic therapy with primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Investigators.急性心肌梗死溶栓治疗与直接冠状动脉血管成形术的比较。心肌梗死分诊与干预研究组。
N Engl J Med. 1996 Oct 24;335(17):1253-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199610243351701.
7
Coronary thrombolysis.冠状动脉溶栓
Chest. 1998 Nov;114(5 Suppl):634S-657S. doi: 10.1378/chest.114.5_supplement.634s.
8
[Infarction: thrombolysis or angioplasty? That's the question...].
Presse Med. 2000 Feb 5;29(4):190-1.
9
Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术治疗急性心肌梗死
Cardiol Clin. 1989 Nov;7(4):837-51.
10
The ideal reperfusion strategy for the ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patient with expected delay to percutaneous coronary intervention: paradise lost or paradise renamed?对于预计延迟进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者,理想的再灌注策略:失乐园还是新乐园?
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Oct;2(10):931-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.08.012.