Suppr超能文献

Thrombolytic therapy versus primary angioplasty. Which offers the best outcome after myocardial infarction?

作者信息

Faxon D P

机构信息

University of Southern California School of Medicine 90033, USA.

出版信息

Postgrad Med. 1997 Nov;102(5):97-8, 103-4, 107-8 passim. doi: 10.3810/pgm.1997.11.356.

Abstract

The best technique for reestablishing blood flow after myocardial infarction has been the subject of heated debate for more than a decade. An the answer is still elusive. Which option is the safest? Which salvages the most heart tissue? Dr Faxon explains the pros and cons of both thrombolysis and angioplasty and discusses the "90 rule," which helps determine the optimal reperfusion strategy for each individual patient.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验