• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统(GITS)用于基层医疗环境中的高血压患者:缓释拜新同加拿大试验(EXACT)结果

Nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) for hypertensive patients in a primary care setting: results of the Extended Release Adalat Canadian Trial (EXACT).

作者信息

Toal C B, Mahon W A, Barnes C, Burelle D

机构信息

Bayer Inc., Etobicoke, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1997 Sep-Oct;19(5):924-35. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(97)80046-x.

DOI:10.1016/s0149-2918(97)80046-x
PMID:9385481
Abstract

Nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) is an extended-release dosage formulation that provides sustained blood concentrations of nifedipine over 24 hours. A 20-week, postmarketing surveillance study of the effectiveness and patient tolerability of nifedipine GITS 30 or 60 mg was conducted in the offices of 187 Canadian general practitioners from September 1992 to March 1994. A total of 1700 patients previously or newly diagnosed with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension (sitting diastolic blood pressure, 95 to 114 mm Hg) were included. The 20-week treatment period was completed by 1326 patients. Patients received nifedipine GITS 30 mg initially; the dose could be titrated upward to 60 mg after 3 and 6 weeks. Of all patients entered, 605 (35.6%) reported one or more adverse events. The three most frequently occurring adverse events were headache (12.2%), peripheral edema (8.1%), and dizziness (2.9%). The frequency of adverse events was highest in the first 3 weeks and decreased subsequently. The overall incidence of adverse events was 29.8% in patients receiving 30 mg of nifedipine GITS and 25.3% in those receiving 60 mg; adverse events were the cause of study discontinuation in 12.3% of patients. The overall health status of patients as measured by the SF-36 questionnaire was comparable to that previously reported for healthy individuals. At baseline, mean (+/- SE) systolic/diastolic blood pressure values for all patients were 160.1 +/- 0.4/97.4 +/- 0.2 mm Hg. Final blood pressure readings after 20 weeks of treatment in the 30-mg group (141.5 +/- 0.4/84.8 +/- 0.2 mm Hg) and the 60-mg group (146.6 +/- 0.8/88.8 +/- 0.4 mm Hg) were significantly decreased from baseline. At week 20, the 30-mg dose was sufficient to maintain blood pressure in 74.5% of patients; 25.5% of patients required 60 mg. Subgroup analysis revealed similar responses in patients who had received blood pressure medication before study initiation and those who had not. Response was also independent of age and type of previous antihypertensive therapy. In general medical practice, the 30-mg and 60-mg doses of nifedipine GITS were both effective and well tolerated and had minimal or no negative effects on the overall health status of treated individuals.

摘要

硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统(GITS)是一种缓释剂型,可在24小时内维持硝苯地平的血药浓度。1992年9月至1994年3月,在187名加拿大全科医生的诊所中进行了一项为期20周的上市后监测研究,以评估30毫克或60毫克硝苯地平GITS的有效性和患者耐受性。总共纳入了1700例先前或新诊断为轻度至中度原发性高血压(坐位舒张压为95至114毫米汞柱)的患者。1326例患者完成了20周的治疗期。患者最初接受30毫克硝苯地平GITS治疗;3周和6周后剂量可上调至60毫克。在所有入组患者中,605例(35.6%)报告了一种或多种不良事件。最常出现的三种不良事件是头痛(12.2%)、外周水肿(8.1%)和头晕(2.9%)。不良事件的发生率在最初3周最高,随后下降。接受30毫克硝苯地平GITS的患者不良事件总发生率为29.8%,接受60毫克的患者为25.3%;不良事件是12.3%患者停药的原因。通过SF-36问卷测量的患者总体健康状况与先前报道的健康个体相当。基线时,所有患者的平均(±标准误)收缩压/舒张压值为160.1±0.4/97.4±0.2毫米汞柱。30毫克组(141.5±0.4/84.8±0.2毫米汞柱)和60毫克组(146.6±0.8/88.8±0.4毫米汞柱)在治疗20周后的最终血压读数较基线显著降低。在第20周时,30毫克剂量足以维持74.5%患者的血压;25.5%的患者需要60毫克。亚组分析显示,在研究开始前接受过降压药物治疗的患者和未接受过治疗的患者中,反应相似。反应也与年龄和先前的抗高血压治疗类型无关。在一般医疗实践中,30毫克和60毫克剂量的硝苯地平GITS均有效且耐受性良好,对接受治疗个体的总体健康状况影响极小或无负面影响。

相似文献

1
Nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) for hypertensive patients in a primary care setting: results of the Extended Release Adalat Canadian Trial (EXACT).硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统(GITS)用于基层医疗环境中的高血压患者:缓释拜新同加拿大试验(EXACT)结果
Clin Ther. 1997 Sep-Oct;19(5):924-35. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(97)80046-x.
2
Efficacy, tolerability, and quality of life of losartan, alone or with hydrochlorothiazide, versus nifedipine GITS in patients with essential hypertension.氯沙坦单独或与氢氯噻嗪联用与硝苯地平控释片治疗原发性高血压患者的疗效、耐受性及生活质量比较
Clin Ther. 1996 May-Jun;18(3):411-28. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(96)80022-1.
3
Efficacy and tolerability of extended-release felodipine and extended-release nifedipine in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.缓释非洛地平和缓释硝苯地平治疗轻至中度原发性高血压患者的疗效及耐受性
Clin Ther. 1994 Jul-Aug;16(4):634-46.
4
Blood pressure control in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension switched from nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) 30 mg to nifedipine GITS 20 mg.轻度至中度原发性高血压患者的血压控制从硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统(GITS)30毫克转换为硝苯地平GITS 20毫克。
Clin Ther. 2001 Jan;23(1):87-96. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80032-1.
5
Efficacy and tolerability of long-acting nifedipine GITS/OROS monotherapy or combination therapy in hypertensive patients: results of a 12-week international, prospective, multicentre, observational study.长效硝苯地平 GITS/OROS 单药治疗或联合治疗高血压患者的疗效和耐受性:一项为期 12 周的国际、前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究结果。
Clin Drug Investig. 2011;31(9):631-42. doi: 10.2165/11588970-000000000-00000.
6
Prazosin GITS vs sustained release nifedipine in patients with hypertension and abnormal lipid profile: a randomized, controlled, multicenter study. Madras Hypertension Study Group.高血压合并血脂异常患者中哌唑嗪控释片与硝苯地平缓释片的比较:一项随机、对照、多中心研究。马德拉斯高血压研究组
J Assoc Physicians India. 1998;Suppl 1:30-40.
7
Nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system versus nifedipine coat-core: comparison of efficacy via 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统与硝苯地平包芯片:通过24小时动态血压监测比较疗效
Ann Pharmacother. 1997 Jul-Aug;31(7-8):819-22. doi: 10.1177/106002809703100701.
8
Comparison of nifedipine GITS and hydrochlorothiazide in the management of elderly patients with stage I-III diastolic hypertension.硝苯地平控释片与氢氯噻嗪治疗老年Ⅰ-Ⅲ期舒张期高血压的比较。
Am J Hypertens. 1996 Jun;9(6):598-606. doi: 10.1016/0895-7061(96)00168-9.
9
Comparison of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure data in hypertensive patients switched from nifedipine-GITS to nifedipine-CC.从硝苯地平控释片转换为硝苯地平普通片的高血压患者24小时动态血压数据比较。
Pharmacotherapy. 1999 Jan;19(1):94-100. doi: 10.1592/phco.19.1.94.30512.
10
Combination therapy with nifedipine GITS 60 mg: subanalysis of a prospective, 12-week observational study (AdADOSE).硝苯地平控释片60毫克联合治疗:一项前瞻性12周观察性研究(AdADOSE)的亚分析
Clin Exp Hypertens. 2016;38(1):71-80. doi: 10.3109/10641963.2015.1060986. Epub 2015 Sep 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-acting nifedipine in the management of essential hypertension: a review for cardiologists.长效硝苯地平在原发性高血压治疗中的应用:心血管科医生的综述
Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2024 Dec 15;14(6):396-413. doi: 10.62347/RPMZ6407. eCollection 2024.
2
Effectiveness and Tolerability of Nifedipine GITS in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Uncontrolled Hypertension: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study (ADRENAL).硝苯地平控释片治疗慢性肾脏病伴未控制高血压患者的有效性和耐受性:一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究(ADRENAL)。
Adv Ther. 2021 Sep;38(9):4771-4785. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01850-3. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
3
Evaluation of a Common Prescribing Cascade of Calcium Channel Blockers and Diuretics in Older Adults With Hypertension.
评估老年高血压患者中钙通道阻滞剂和利尿剂的常见处方级联反应。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 May 1;180(5):643-651. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.7087.
4
An evaluation of a potential calcium channel blocker-lower-extremity edema-loop diuretic prescribing cascade.评估潜在的钙通道阻滞剂-下肢水肿-袢利尿剂处方级联反应。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2018 Sep-Oct;58(5):534-539.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2018.06.014. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
5
Nifedipine plus candesartan combination increases blood pressure control regardless of race and improves the side effect profile: DISTINCT randomized trial results.硝苯地平联合坎地沙坦可提高血压控制率,不受种族影响,并改善副作用情况:DISTINCT随机试验结果。
J Hypertens. 2014 Dec;32(12):2488-98; discussion 2498. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000331.
6
Modified-release nifedipine: a review of the use of modified-release formulations in the treatment of hypertension and angina pectoris.缓释硝苯地平:关于缓释制剂在高血压和心绞痛治疗中应用的综述
Drugs. 2006;66(4):497-528. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200666040-00007.
7
Calcium channel blocker-related periperal edema: can it be resolved?钙通道阻滞剂相关的外周性水肿:能否得到解决?
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2003 Jul-Aug;5(4):291-4, 297. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2003.02402.x.