Johnson L L, Verdesca S A, Aude W Y, Xavier R C, Nott L T, Campanella M W, Germano G
Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University, Providence 02906, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Dec;30(7):1641-8. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00388-4.
This study was designed to investigate whether left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) calculated from post-stress single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) reflects the basal value for LVEF or whether post-stress LVEF is reduced in some patients with stress-induced ischemia.
Automated programs are now commercially available for assessing global left ventricular (LV) function from post-stress technetium-99m sestamibi gated SPECT performed >15 min after completion of exercise.
Eighty-one sequential patients who underwent a 2-day stress/rest sestamibi imaging protocol and showed perfusion defects on the post-stress tomogram underwent gated acquisition of the second-day rest tomogram. The post-stress and rest tomographic images were read for presence, location, severity and reversibility of defects by consensus of two to three experienced observers with the aid of circumferential count displays. Defects were scored as mild, moderate or severe and as completely or partially reversible or fixed, and a summed defect severity score was calculated. Of these 81 scans, 20 showed nonreversible perfusion defects (group 3), whereas 61 showed reversible perfusion defects. Post-stress and rest LVEF was calculated from the processed gated SPECT data. From 15 additional patients who underwent rest gated SPECT studies on separate days, serial reproducibility of LVEF values calculated from the gated SPECT data was determined to be +/-5.2%. Coronary angiography was performed within 3 months of the scan without intervening events in 47 of 81 patients, including 39 of 61 with reversible perfusion defects.
In 22 (36%) of 61 patients with reversible perfusion defects, post-stress LVEF was >5% lower than that at rest (group 2), whereas in the remaining 39 patients, post-stress LVEF was either +/-5% or greater than that at rest (group 1). Segmental chordal shortening analysis performed in group 2 studies showed that differences in chordal shortening between rest and post-stress were significantly greater in the reversible perfusion defect territories than in the nonischemic perfusion defect territories ([mean +/- SD] 0.14 +/- 0.14 vs. 0.02 +/- 0.09, respectively, p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences among groups for any of the following variables: age, gender, previous myocardial infarction and type of stress. Time to imaging and stress and scan variables were correlated with the change in LVEF by univariate analysis, and the two variables that correlated significantly were the summed defect reversibility score on the scan and a left anterior descending coronary artery location of the scan defect. Only summed defect reversibility score was significant on multivariate analysis.
When the only gated sestamibi scan is the post-stress scan, global and regional LV function will not represent basal LV function in all patients with stress-induced ischemia.
本研究旨在调查应激后单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)计算得出的左心室射血分数(LVEF)是否反映LVEF的基础值,或者应激后LVEF在某些应激性心肌缺血患者中是否降低。
现在有商业可用的自动化程序,用于从运动完成后>15分钟进行的应激后锝-99m甲氧基异丁基异腈门控SPECT评估左心室(LV)整体功能。
81例连续患者接受了为期2天的应激/静息甲氧基异丁基异腈成像方案,且应激后断层扫描显示灌注缺损,对其第二天的静息断层扫描进行门控采集。由两到三名经验丰富的观察者在圆周计数显示的帮助下,通过共识读取应激后和静息断层图像中缺损的存在、位置、严重程度和可逆性。缺损分为轻度、中度或重度,以及完全或部分可逆或固定,并计算总缺损严重程度评分。在这81次扫描中,20次显示不可逆灌注缺损(第3组),而61次显示可逆灌注缺损。从处理后的门控SPECT数据计算应激后和静息LVEF。从另外15例在不同日期接受静息门控SPECT研究的患者中,确定从门控SPECT数据计算得出的LVEF值的系列重复性为±5.2%。81例患者中的47例在扫描后3个月内进行了冠状动脉造影,无干预事件,其中61例有可逆灌注缺损的患者中有39例。
在61例有可逆灌注缺损的患者中,22例(36%)应激后LVEF比静息时低>5%(第2组),而其余39例患者中,应激后LVEF与静息时相比为±5%或更高(第1组)。在第2组研究中进行的节段性腱索缩短分析表明,静息和应激后腱索缩短的差异在可逆灌注缺损区域比在非缺血性灌注缺损区域显著更大(分别为[平均值±标准差]0.14±0.14对0.02±0.09,p<0.0001)。以下任何变量在各组之间均无显著差异:年龄、性别、既往心肌梗死和应激类型。通过单变量分析,成像时间、应激和扫描变量与LVEF的变化相关,显著相关的两个变量是扫描上的总缺损可逆性评分和扫描缺损的左前降支冠状动脉位置。在多变量分析中只有总缺损可逆性评分显著。
当唯一的门控甲氧基异丁基异腈扫描是应激后扫描时,在所有应激性心肌缺血患者中,左心室整体和局部功能并不代表左心室基础功能。