Borges-Neto S, Javaid A, Shaw L K, Kong D F, Hanson M W, Pagnanelli R A, Ravizzini G, Coleman R E
Departments of Radiology-Nuclear Medicine, Duke University Medical Center and Health Systems, Duke North Rm 1410, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Radiology. 2000 May;215(2):529-33. doi: 10.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ma13529.
To investigate the relationship between the development of ischemia during stress testing and the changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measurements obtained after stress and at rest with a same-day perfusion-function imaging protocol.
One hundred twenty-six patients underwent a same-day rest-stress (61%) or stress-rest (39%) protocol and gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Perfusion analysis was performed with a 12-segment model. Defects were scored (0 = no defect, 1 = mild defect, 2 = moderate defect, and 3 = severe defect); differences between the summed stress and resting scores of greater than three indicated substantial ischemia.
Resting and poststress LVEFs correlated significantly (r = 0.97, P <.001); however, patients with and patients without ischemia had significant differences in poststress versus resting LVEFs (-4.0 vs 1.0, respectively; P <.01). In patients with ischemia versus patients without ischemia, subgroup analysis stress-rest (-2.5 vs 1.0, P =.047) and rest-stress (-4.0 vs 1.0, P =.006) protocols yielded similar results.
In patients with clinically important stress-induced perfusion abnormalities, the LVEF after stress was significantly lower than the LVEF at rest with same-day rest-stress and stress-rest imaging protocols. In the clinical setting, poststress LVEFs may be lower than true resting measurements, particularly in patients with moderate to severe stress-induced ischemia.
采用当日灌注功能成像方案,研究负荷试验期间缺血的发生与负荷后及静息时获得的左心室射血分数(LVEF)测量值变化之间的关系。
126例患者接受了当日静息-负荷(61%)或负荷-静息(39%)方案及门控单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)。采用12节段模型进行灌注分析。对缺损进行评分(0=无缺损,1=轻度缺损,2=中度缺损,3=重度缺损);负荷总分与静息总分之间的差异大于3表明存在明显缺血。
静息和负荷后LVEF显著相关(r=0.97,P<.001);然而,有缺血和无缺血患者的负荷后与静息LVEF存在显著差异(分别为-4.0和1.0;P<.01)。在有缺血与无缺血患者中,亚组分析的负荷-静息(-2.5对1.0,P=.047)和静息-负荷(-4.0对1.0,P=.006)方案产生了相似结果。
对于临床上有重要意义的负荷诱导灌注异常患者,采用当日静息-负荷和负荷-静息成像方案时,负荷后LVEF显著低于静息时LVEF。在临床环境中,负荷后LVEF可能低于真实的静息测量值,特别是在有中度至重度负荷诱导缺血的患者中。