Suppr超能文献

治疗师主导方案的法律问题。治疗师主导方案是否会使治疗师陷入法律困境?

Legal aspects of therapist-driven protocols. Do therapist-driven protocols place therapists in a legally compromising position?

作者信息

Meehan M J

机构信息

Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Respir Care Clin N Am. 1996 Mar;2(1):133-45.

PMID:9390875
Abstract

The recent introduction of therapist-driven protocols has given the appearance of restricting the professional judgment of respiratory therapists with decision-tree robotics while contemporaneously catapulting them into the practice of medicine. This is happening in the midst of a spiraling litigation climate. This article examines the legal aspects--from malpractice to licensure--of this exciting new practice known as therapist-driven respiratory protocols.

摘要

近期治疗师驱动方案的引入,看似通过决策树机器人技术限制了呼吸治疗师的专业判断,与此同时却又将他们迅速推进到医疗实践中。而这一切发生在诉讼环境不断升级的背景下。本文探讨了这种被称为治疗师驱动呼吸方案的全新且令人兴奋的实践在法律方面的问题——从医疗事故到执业许可。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验