Suppr超能文献

比较早期术后放疗与使用非甾体类抗炎药预防人工全髋关节置换术后异位骨化的随机试验。

Randomized trial comparing early postoperative irradiation vs. the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs for prevention of heterotopic ossification following prosthetic total hip replacement.

作者信息

Kölbl O, Knelles D, Barthel T, Kraus U, Flentje M, Eulert J

机构信息

Clinic and Policlinic for Radiotherapy of the University of Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997 Dec 1;39(5):961-6. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00496-3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

A randomized trial was undertaken to assess the comparative efficacy of early postoperative irradiation with either 5 or 7 Gy vs. the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) for prevention of heterotopic ossification (HO) following prosthetic total hip replacement (THP).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1993 and 1994, 301 patients were randomized to receive postoperative irradiation (5 or 7 Gy) or NSAID. One hundred and thirteen patients were treated with NSAID (indomethacin 2 x 50 mg/day for 1 week), 93 patients were irradiated with a single 7 Gy fraction, 95 patients with a single 5 Gy fraction. The treatment volume included the soft tissues between the periacetabular region of pelvis and the intertrochanteric portion of the femur. X-rays of treated hips were obtained immediately and 6 months after surgery. Heterotopic ossification was scored according to the Brooker Grading system. One hundred patients receiving no prophylactic therapy after total hip arthroplasty between 1988 and 1992, were analyzed and defined as historical control group.

RESULTS

Incidence of heterotopic ossification was 16.0% in NSAID-group (Brooker Score I: 8.0%; II: 6.2%; III: 1.8%; IV: 0%), 30.1% in 5 Gy group (Brooker Score I: 24.7%; II: 4.3%; III: 1.1%; IV: 0%), and 11.1% in 7 Gy group (Brooker Score I: 11.6%; II: 0%; III: 0%; IV: 0%). Regarding overall heterotopic ossification there was a significant difference between the NSAID group and the 5 Gy group (p < .015), respectively, between the 7 Gy group and the 5 Gy group (p < .0001). No significant difference was noted in the influence of overall HO between the NSAID and the 7 Gy group (p > 0.3). Analyzing the clinically significant HO (Brooker Score III and IV) patients irradiated with 7 Gy developed less HO than those treated with NSAID (p = 0.003). Incidence of HO was greater in the untreated historical control group (Brooker Score I: 26%; II: 15%; III: 19%; IV: 5%) than in all three prophylacticly treated groups.

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic irradiation of the operative site after hip replacement with single a 7 Gy fraction is the most effective postoperative treatment schedule in prevention of clinically significant heterotopic ossification. This therapy modality is more effective than irradiation with a single 5 Gy fraction or use of NSAID.

摘要

目的

进行一项随机试验,以评估术后早期给予5 Gy或7 Gy照射与使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)预防人工全髋关节置换术(THP)后异位骨化(HO)的相对疗效。

方法和材料

1993年至1994年间,301例患者被随机分配接受术后照射(5 Gy或7 Gy)或NSAID治疗。113例患者接受NSAID治疗(吲哚美辛2×50 mg/天,共1周),93例患者接受单次7 Gy照射,95例患者接受单次5 Gy照射。治疗范围包括骨盆髋臼周围区域与股骨转子间部分之间的软组织。在术后即刻及术后6个月对治疗的髋关节进行X线检查。根据布鲁克分级系统对异位骨化进行评分。对1988年至1992年间全髋关节置换术后未接受预防性治疗的100例患者进行分析,并将其定义为历史对照组。

结果

NSAID组异位骨化发生率为16.0%(布鲁克评分I级:8.0%;II级:6.2%;III级:1.8%;IV级:0%),5 Gy组为30.1%(布鲁克评分I级:24.7%;II级:4.3%;III级:1.1%;IV级:0%),7 Gy组为11.1%(布鲁克评分I级:11.6%;II级:0%;III级:0%;IV级:0%)。就总体异位骨化而言,NSAID组与5 Gy组之间存在显著差异(p <.015),7 Gy组与5 Gy组之间也存在显著差异(p <.0001)。NSAID组与7 Gy组在总体HO影响方面未观察到显著差异(p > 0.3)。分析具有临床意义的HO(布鲁克评分III级和IV级),接受7 Gy照射患者发生的HO少于接受NSAID治疗的患者(p = 0.003)。未治疗的历史对照组中HO发生率(布鲁克评分I级:26%;II级:15%;III级:19%;IV级:5%)高于所有三个预防性治疗组。

结论

髋关节置换术后对手术部位进行单次7 Gy预防性照射是预防具有临床意义的异位骨化最有效的术后治疗方案。这种治疗方式比单次5 Gy照射或使用NSAID更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验