Suppr超能文献

头高位倾斜试验期间的心脏停搏:发生率及治疗意义

Asystolic cardiac arrest during head-up tilt test: incidence and therapeutic implications.

作者信息

Lacroix D, Kouakam C, Klug D, Guédon-Moreau L, Vaksmann G, Kacet S, Lekieffre J

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Hôpital Cardiologique de Lille, University of Lille, France.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Nov;20(11):2746-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb05432.x.

Abstract

Occasionally, the cardioinhibitory response may be profound during tilt induced syncope. Whether this response is associated with more severe symptoms or predicts a poor response to pharmacotherapy remains controversial. The aim of this study was to characterize patients with vasovagally mediated asystole occurring during head-up tilt test and to evaluate the respective interests of sequential pacing and beta-blockers to treat them. We performed 60 degree tilt testing in 179 consecutive patients with unexplained syncope (91 women and 88 men, age 36.6 +/- 20.1 years). Asystole was defined as a ventricular pause > 5 seconds. All patients with tilt induced asystole received therapy with either beta-blockers or sequential pacing, the efficacy of which was evaluated with serial tilt tests. Of 77 patients with positive tilt test, 10 developed syncope related to asystole (mean duration 11.9 +/- 4.9 s), 2 with spontaneous recovery, and 8 with seizures needing a brief cardiopulmonary resuscitation. When compared with patients without asystole, asystolic patients had more severe symptoms (seizures: 6/10 vs 9/67, P = 0.05, injury 9/10 vs 27/67, P = 0.0048). In the first six patients in whom cardiac pacing was considered, syncope or presyncope still occurred despite atrioventricular pacing at 45 beats/min. Five of these 6 patients, as well as the remaining 4 asystolic patients, were tilted with beta-blockers: 3 patients became tilt-negative; 3 were significantly improved; and 3 did not respond. During follow-up (mean 22.7 +/- 11.7 months) with every patient taking beta-blockers and seven having a permanent pacemaker, no syncopal recurrence was observed. Tilt-induced asystole that may require resuscitative maneuvers occurs especially in patients with a history of seizures or injury. Therapy with beta-blockers in often effective to prevent induction of syncope as well as recurrences.

摘要

偶尔,在倾斜诱发的晕厥期间,心脏抑制反应可能会很严重。这种反应是否与更严重的症状相关,或者是否预示着对药物治疗反应不佳,仍存在争议。本研究的目的是对在头高位倾斜试验期间发生血管迷走性介导的心搏停止的患者进行特征描述,并评估序贯起搏和β受体阻滞剂治疗这些患者的各自效果。我们对179例连续的不明原因晕厥患者(91例女性和88例男性,年龄36.6±20.1岁)进行了60度倾斜试验。心搏停止定义为心室停搏>5秒。所有倾斜诱发心搏停止的患者均接受β受体阻滞剂或序贯起搏治疗,并通过系列倾斜试验评估其疗效。在77例倾斜试验阳性的患者中,10例发生了与心搏停止相关的晕厥(平均持续时间11.9±4.9秒),2例自发恢复,8例发生惊厥,需要短暂的心肺复苏。与无心搏停止的患者相比,心搏停止患者的症状更严重(惊厥:6/10 vs 9/67,P = 0.05;受伤:9/10 vs 27/67,P = 0.0048)。在最初考虑心脏起搏的6例患者中,尽管以45次/分钟的频率进行房室起搏,仍发生了晕厥或先兆晕厥。这6例患者中的5例以及其余4例心搏停止患者接受了β受体阻滞剂倾斜试验:3例患者倾斜试验转为阴性;3例有明显改善;3例无反应。在随访期间(平均22.7±11.7个月),所有患者均服用β受体阻滞剂,7例患者植入了永久起搏器,未观察到晕厥复发。倾斜诱发的心搏停止可能需要复苏操作,尤其发生在有惊厥或受伤史的患者中。β受体阻滞剂治疗通常有效地预防晕厥的诱发以及复发。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验