Olin P, Rasmussen F, Gustafsson L, Hallander H O, Heijbel H
Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lancet. 1997 Nov 29;350(9091):1569-77. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)06508-2.
Trials in Italy and Sweden showed high efficacy for three-component and five-component pertussis vaccines, and poor efficacy for a whole-cell vaccine licensed in the USA and a two-component vaccine. We compared the efficacy of three acellular vaccines with a UK whole-cell vaccine.
We enrolled 82,892 babies aged 2-3 months. Babies were vaccinated at age 3 months, 5 months, and 12 months, or age 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months. They were randomly assigned a two-component acellular diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) vaccine (n = 20,697), a three-component acellular DTP vaccine (n = 20,728), a five-component acellular DTP vaccine (n = 20,747), or a UK whole-cell DTP vaccine (n = 20,720). We collected data for all reported cases of culture-confirmed pertussis during 3 years of follow-up. The treatment status of the two-component-vaccine group had to be made known midway through the trial for boosting because of poor efficacy. We included data for the two-component vaccine in the analysis of safety and immunogenicity, and data up its unmasking in secondary analyses of relative efficacy. Analyses were by intention to treat.
During follow-up from the third dose (mean 22 months), in the 3 months, 5 months, 12 months schedule, there were 15 cases of culture-confirmed pertussis with at least 21 days of paroxysmal cough in the whole-cell group, relative risk 1.00, compared with 13 in the five-component group (0.85 [95% CI 0.41-1.79]), and 21 in the three-component group (1.38 [0.71-2.69]). For culture-confirmed pertussis, with or without cough, there were 19 cases in the whole-cell group (1.00). 27 in the five-component group (1.40 [0.78-2.52]), and 49 in the three-component group (2.55 [1.50-4.33]). In the intention-to-treat analyses, from the first dose in the 3 months, 5 months, 12 months schedule the whole-cell vaccine was significantly more protective than the three-component vaccine against typical pertussis. Between the second and the third doses, culture-confirmed pertussis with any cough and with at least 21 days of paroxysmal cough was significantly more frequent in the two-component group than in the three-component group, and in the three-component group than in the five-component and the whole-cell groups, respectively. The serological response of the acellular vaccines in the 2 months, 4 months, 6 months schedule were similar to those previously reported. The whole-cell vaccine was highly immunogenic for fimbriae, pertactin, and filamentous haemagglutinin, but had a low antipertussis toxin response. Hypotonic hyporesponsiveness occurred significantly more frequently in the whole-cell group (p < 0.05) and was more frequent in the acellular groups than previously reported. High fever and seizures occurred more frequently after whole-cell vaccine than after any of the acellular vaccines (p < 0.001).
The efficacy of the UK whole-cell vaccine and the five-component and three-component vaccines was similar against culture-confirmed pertussis with at least 21 days of paroxysmal cough. The lower efficacy of the three-component vaccine against mild disease suggests that fimbriae have a role in protection against infection. The efficacy of acellular vaccines depends on the number of components, and different whole-cell vaccines have variable efficacies.
意大利和瑞典的试验表明,三组分和五组分百日咳疫苗疗效高,而美国许可的全细胞疫苗和双组分疫苗疗效差。我们比较了三种无细胞疫苗与一种英国全细胞疫苗的疗效。
我们招募了82892名2至3个月大的婴儿。婴儿在3个月、5个月和12个月龄时接种疫苗,或在2个月、4个月和6个月龄时接种。他们被随机分配接种双组分无细胞白喉-破伤风-百日咳(DTP)疫苗(n = 20697)、三组分无细胞DTP疫苗(n = 20728)、五组分无细胞DTP疫苗(n = 20747)或英国全细胞DTP疫苗(n = 20720)。我们收集了随访3年期间所有报告的培养确诊百日咳病例的数据。由于疗效不佳,双组分疫苗组的治疗状态在试验进行到一半时不得不公布以进行加强接种。我们在安全性和免疫原性分析中纳入了双组分疫苗的数据,并在相对疗效的二次分析中纳入了其揭盲前的数据。分析采用意向性治疗。
在第三剂接种后的随访期间(平均22个月),在3个月、5个月、12个月的接种程序中,全细胞组有15例培养确诊的百日咳病例,伴有至少21天的阵发性咳嗽,相对风险为1.00,五组分组有13例(0.85 [95% CI 0.41 - 1.79]),三组分组有21例(1.38 [0.71 - 2.69])。对于培养确诊的百日咳,无论有无咳嗽,全细胞组有19例(1.00),五组分组有27例(1.40 [0.78 - 2.52]),三组分组有49例(2.55 [1.50 - 4.33])。在意向性治疗分析中,从3个月、5个月、12个月接种程序的第一剂开始,全细胞疫苗对典型百日咳的保护作用明显优于三组分疫苗。在第二剂和第三剂之间,伴有任何咳嗽且至少有21天阵发性咳嗽的培养确诊百日咳在双组分组中比在三组分组中更频繁,在三组分组中分别比在五组分组和全细胞组中更频繁。2个月、4个月、6个月接种程序中无细胞疫苗的血清学反应与先前报道的相似。全细胞疫苗对菌毛、百日咳黏附素和丝状血凝素具有高度免疫原性,但抗百日咳毒素反应较低。低渗性低反应性在全细胞组中显著更频繁地发生(p < 0.05),并且在无细胞组中比先前报道的更频繁。全细胞疫苗接种后高热和惊厥的发生比任何一种无细胞疫苗接种后都更频繁(p < 0.001)。
英国全细胞疫苗以及五组分和三组分疫苗对伴有至少21天阵发性咳嗽的培养确诊百日咳的疗效相似。三组分疫苗对轻症疾病的疗效较低表明菌毛在预防感染中起作用。无细胞疫苗的疗效取决于组分数量,不同的全细胞疫苗疗效各不相同。