Fijalkowska I J, Dunn R L, Schaaper R M
Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA.
J Bacteriol. 1997 Dec;179(23):7435-45. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.23.7435-7445.1997.
To better understand the mechanisms of SOS mutagenesis in the bacterium Escherichia coli, we have undertaken a genetic analysis of the SOS mutator activity. The SOS mutator activity results from constitutive expression of the SOS system in strains carrying a constitutively activated RecA protein (RecA730). We show that the SOS mutator activity is not enhanced in strains containing deficiencies in the uvrABC nucleotide excision-repair system or the xth and nfo base excision-repair systems. Further, recA730-induced errors are shown to be corrected by the MutHLS-dependent mismatch-repair system as efficiently as the corresponding errors in the rec+ background. These results suggest that the SOS mutator activity does not reflect mutagenesis at so-called cryptic lesions but instead represents an amplification of normally occurring DNA polymerase errors. Analysis of the base-pair-substitution mutations induced by recA730 in a mismatch repair-deficient background shows that both transition and transversion errors are amplified, although the effect is much larger for transversions than for transitions. Analysis of the mutator effect in various dnaE strains, including dnaE antimutators, as well as in proofreading-deficient dnaQ (mutD) strains suggests that in recA730 strains, two types of replication errors occur in parallel: (i) normal replication errors that are subject to both exonucleolytic proofreading and dnaE antimutator effects and (ii) recA730-specific errors that are not susceptible to either proofreading or dnaE antimutator effects. The combined data are consistent with a model suggesting that in recA730 cells error-prone replication complexes are assembled at sites where DNA polymerization is temporarily stalled, most likely when a normal polymerase insertion error has created a poorly extendable terminal mismatch. The modified complex forces extension of the mismatch largely at the exclusion of proofreading and polymerase dissociation pathways. SOS mutagenesis targeted at replication-blocking DNA lesions likely proceeds in the same manner.
为了更好地理解大肠杆菌中SOS诱变的机制,我们对SOS诱变活性进行了遗传分析。SOS诱变活性源于携带组成型激活的RecA蛋白(RecA730)的菌株中SOS系统的组成型表达。我们发现,在uvrABC核苷酸切除修复系统或xth和nfo碱基切除修复系统存在缺陷的菌株中,SOS诱变活性并未增强。此外,RecA730诱导的错误被MutHLS依赖性错配修复系统校正的效率与rec⁺背景下的相应错误相同。这些结果表明,SOS诱变活性并不反映所谓隐蔽损伤处的诱变,而是代表正常发生的DNA聚合酶错误的放大。对RecA730在错配修复缺陷背景下诱导的碱基对替代突变的分析表明,转换和颠换错误均被放大,尽管颠换的影响比转换大得多。对包括dnaE抗诱变菌株在内的各种dnaE菌株以及校对缺陷的dnaQ(mutD)菌株中的诱变效应分析表明,在recA730菌株中,两种类型的复制错误并行发生:(i)正常复制错误,其受到核酸外切酶校对和dnaE抗诱变效应的影响;(ii)RecA730特异性错误,其对校对或dnaE抗诱变效应均不敏感。综合数据与一个模型一致,该模型表明,在recA730细胞中,易错复制复合物在DNA聚合暂时停滞的位点组装,最有可能是当正常的聚合酶插入错误产生了难以延伸的末端错配时。修饰后的复合物主要迫使错配延伸,同时排除校对和聚合酶解离途径。针对复制阻断性DNA损伤的SOS诱变可能以相同方式进行。